Comparing Lag Between f(x,t) and g(x,t): Homework Equations and Solutions"

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pushoam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    math for physics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the phase relationship between the functions f(x,t) = cos(kx - ωt) and g(x,t) = cos(kx - ωt + ε). By substituting x = 0, the analysis shows that if ε > 0, then g lags behind f, while if ε < 0, f lags behind g. The conclusion is that the sign of ε directly indicates which function leads or lags in time, assuming ω > 0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of trigonometric functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with phase shifts in wave equations
  • Knowledge of angular frequency (ω) and its implications
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study phase shifts in trigonometric functions
  • Learn about wave interference and superposition principles
  • Explore the implications of angular frequency in oscillatory motion
  • Investigate the effects of different values of ε on wave behavior
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering, particularly those studying wave mechanics, oscillations, or trigonometric functions in mathematical contexts.

Pushoam
Messages
961
Reaction score
53

Homework Statement


We have ## f(x,t) = cos(kx - \omega t)

\\ g(x,t) = cos(kx - \omega t + \epsilon ) ##

How to find out whether f lags behind g or vice -versa?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I took, x =0,

g (t') = f(t)

## - \omega t' + \epsilon = - \omega t ##
## t' = t + \frac { \epsilon }{\omega} ##

If ## \epsilon ## > 0, then t'> t, thus g lags behind f.

And if ## \epsilon < 0 ## , then t'<t , thus f lags behind g.

Is this correct?

Or is there any other way to find quickly just by seeing the functions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pushoam said:
Is this correct?
Right, assuming ω>0.
Pushoam said:
Or is there any other way to find quickly just by seeing the functions?
To get the same argument as before after introducing a positive ##\epsilon## in the second function, you need a larger t: You have to wait longer.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K