Comparing Lag Between f(x,t) and g(x,t): Homework Equations and Solutions"

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pushoam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    math for physics
AI Thread Summary
To determine the lag between the functions f(x,t) = cos(kx - ωt) and g(x,t) = cos(kx - ωt + ε), the analysis shows that if ε > 0, g lags behind f, while if ε < 0, f lags behind g. By substituting x = 0, the relationship between t and t' can be established, leading to the conclusion that a positive ε results in a larger t' than t, indicating a lag. The discussion also raises the question of whether there are quicker methods to identify the lag by examining the functions directly. The consensus is that the derived relationship holds true under the assumption that ω > 0. Understanding the phase shift ε is crucial for determining the relative timing of the two functions.
Pushoam
Messages
961
Reaction score
53

Homework Statement


We have ## f(x,t) = cos(kx - \omega t)

\\ g(x,t) = cos(kx - \omega t + \epsilon ) ##

How to find out whether f lags behind g or vice -versa?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I took, x =0,

g (t') = f(t)

## - \omega t' + \epsilon = - \omega t ##
## t' = t + \frac { \epsilon }{\omega} ##

If ## \epsilon ## > 0, then t'> t, thus g lags behind f.

And if ## \epsilon < 0 ## , then t'<t , thus f lags behind g.

Is this correct?

Or is there any other way to find quickly just by seeing the functions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pushoam said:
Is this correct?
Right, assuming ω>0.
Pushoam said:
Or is there any other way to find quickly just by seeing the functions?
To get the same argument as before after introducing a positive ##\epsilon## in the second function, you need a larger t: You have to wait longer.
 
Back
Top