Comparing the KE of Alpha and Beta particles

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the challenges of comparing the kinetic energy of alpha and beta particles, highlighting the importance of clear communication in problem-solving. A participant criticizes the use of a poorly presented image instead of typed equations, emphasizing that efforts should be clearly articulated. The correct approach involves starting with the given relationship between the velocities of the particles and properly substituting values into the kinetic energy formulas. Errors in arithmetic and term cancellation are pointed out, stressing the need for careful work and proper equation formatting. Clear and typed equations are essential for accurate problem-solving in physics discussions.
Hemanta
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
If the speed of an alpha particle is 0.5 VB- how does its kinetic energy compare to the kinetic energy of the beta-minus particle?
Relevant Equations
KE = 1/2 mv^2
I try solving it but the answer didn’t match
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    23.5 KB · Views: 238
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You are asking people for help by posting a dimly lit SIDEWAYS figure? This is why the rules say that your efforts should be typed, not posted as an image.
 
phinds said:
You are asking people for help by posting a dimly lit SIDEWAYS figure? This is why the rules say that your efforts should be typed, not posted as an image.
I type too
 
Hemanta said:
I type too
You could have transcribed the image for us then.

As I make it out, you start with the given from the problem:
$$v_\alpha = 0.5 v_\beta$$
You write down formulas for the kinetic energy of the alpha and for the beta.
$$K_\alpha=\frac{1}{2}m_\alpha v_\alpha^2$$ $$K_\beta=\frac{1}{2}m_\beta v_\beta^2$$
You write a scribble that looks like you want to substitute ##(0.5v_\beta)## in for ##v_\alpha##

You evaluate $$\frac{K_\alpha}{K_\beta}$$
cancelling terms wildly (work not shown) you appear to end up with everything canceled except for ##0.5^2## and decide that $$0.5^2 = 0.125$$
In addition to that arithmetic error, you have canceled two terms that do not cancel.

Ideally, you would have included at least one more equation in your work:$$\frac{K_\alpha}{K_\beta}=\frac{ \frac{1}{2}m_\alpha (0.5 v_\beta)^2}{ \frac{1}{2}m_\beta v_\beta^2}$$ With that equation cleanly written, the cancellation of terms is easy to do and hard to do wrong.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes berkeman and PeroK
See, @Hemanta, THAT is what I mean by typing.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and jbriggs444
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top