Comparing Wave Functions: Are \psi_{1} and \psi_{2} in the Same Quantum State?

Axiom17
Messages
70
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



To determine whether two wave functions, \psi_{1} and \psi_{1} correspond to the same quantum state of a particle.

Homework Equations



Calculations (simplified):

\psi_{1}(x,y,z)=A

\psi_{2}(x,y,z)=e^{z}A

The Attempt at a Solution



The two wave functions do correspond to the same quantum state. However I can't figure out the correct wording to explain this. At the moment I just have that "\psi_{1} is equal to \psi_{2} with respect to the independant variable z in the term e^{z}".

Hopefully that's correct, or at least it makes some sense.. sure there's probably a better (more correct) way to write it though. :shy:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Axiom17 said:

Homework Statement



To determine whether two wave functions, \psi_{1} and \psi_{1} correspond to the same quantum state of a particle.

Homework Equations



Calculations (simplified):

\psi_{1}(x,y,z)=A

\psi_{2}(x,y,z)=e^{z}A

The Attempt at a Solution



The two wave functions do correspond to the same quantum state. However I can't figure out the correct wording to explain this. At the moment I just have that "\psi_{1} is equal to \psi_{2} with respect to the independant variable z in the term e^{z}".

Hopefully that's correct, or at least it makes some sense.. sure there's probably a better (more correct) way to write it though. :shy:

You should use the relation of wavefunctions to quantum states. For instance in the coordinate basis |\vec{x}\rangle, we can write

|\psi_1 \rangle = \int d\vec{x}~ \psi_1(\vec{x}) |\vec{x}\rangle .

Then one way to show that two wavefunctions describe the same state would be to show that

\langle \vec{x}|\psi_1 \rangle =\langle\vec{x}|\psi_2 \rangle
 
Are you sure there is e^z and not e^{iz} in your problem? Just checking ...
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top