Comparison of width of a wavefunction in real space and momentum space

BasharTeg
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello, I have a slight problem with Quantumtheory here.

Homework Statement


I have solved the schrödinger equation in the momentum space for a delta potential and also transferred it into real space. So now I have to find the correlation between the width of the wavefunction in both spaces (and then motivate it physically) and I am stuck here because I don't even know where to start.


Homework Equations


\Psi (x) = \sqrt{\kappa}e^{- \kappa |x|}

\Psi (p) = \frac{\sqrt{2 ( \hbar \kappa)^3}}{\sqrt{\pi}(p^2 + (\hbar \kappa)^2)}


The Attempt at a Solution


I was thinking about maybe the uncertainty relation of momentum and space would help here, but I am stuck where to start.


Hope someone can help or give a hint.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just looking at the functions, you can approximate the characteristic width of the wave functions in position space by using \kappa x \approx 1 and in momentum space by using p / \hbar \kappa \approx 1.

If you want to be more precise, calculate \Delta x = \sqrt{\langle x^2 \rangle - \langle x \rangle^2} and \Delta p = \sqrt{\langle p^2 \rangle - \langle p \rangle^2}.
 
Thanks I will look into it. I guess I have to calculate Δx and Δp since I need a correlation how the width in momentum space affects the width in real space and vice versa.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top