Complex amplitude reflectance of a spherical mirror

semc
Messages
364
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


Prove the complex amplitude reflectance of a spherical mirror is given as exp[-jk(x2+y2)/R]


Homework Equations


Transmittance of a spherical mirror is also exp[jk(x2+y2)/2f]


The Attempt at a Solution


I have totally no idea how to go about doing this. Can I just say that the reflectance is the same as the transmittance just that the wave changes the direction of propagation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I realize this is late but here it goes:

See how much phase you accumulate, relative to the plane wave that travels along the optical axis and bounces off a planar mirror.

If you are looking at the plane wave ##\rho = \sqrt{x^2+y^2}## away from the axis in the plane ##z=0## (mirror centre is at ##z=R## ), then to get to the mirror you need to travel additional distance ##d##. Denote ##z_0## the z at which the ray intersects with the mirror at a given ##\rho##.

$$d = z_0 = R - \sqrt{R^2 - \rho^2} = R - R\sqrt{1-(\frac \rho R)^2}$$

Assuming ##\rho## is small (we are close to the axis) compared to R, we can write
$$\sqrt{1-(\frac \rho R)^2} = 1-\frac {\rho^2} {2R^2}$$
and so
$$d = \frac {\rho^2} {2R}$$

Because we traverse that distance twice, the phase gained is ##k*2d = k \frac {\rho^2} {R}## and your complex reflectance is ##e^{ik \frac {\rho^2} {R}}##
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top