Complex gaussian, complete the square

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating a complex integral related to the Fourier transform of a Gaussian function, specifically the integral of the form \(\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} e^{-ax^2} e^{ikx}\, dx\). The original poster attempts to complete the square in the exponent and expresses concerns about the legitimacy of changing a real variable into a complex one while integrating over infinite limits.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the method of completing the square and question the validity of integrating along the complex plane. The original poster raises concerns about the justification for this approach, while others suggest using Cauchy's theorem or analytic continuation as potential solutions.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on using Cauchy's theorem to justify the manipulation of the integral. The conversation reflects a mix of understanding and uncertainty regarding complex analysis, with participants exploring different aspects of the problem without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted lack of familiarity with complex analysis among some participants, which may impact their ability to fully engage with the proposed solutions. The discussion also highlights the need for a rigorous approach when dealing with integrals over infinite limits.

Irid
Messages
207
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Evaluate this integral (in essence the Fourier transform of the Gaussian):

\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} e^{-ax^2} e^{ikx}\, dx

2. The attempt at a solution
One way is to complete the square, so that

-ax^2 + ikx = -a(x-ik/2a)^2 - (k/2a)^2

so the integral becomes
e^{-(k/2a)^2} \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} e^{-a(x-ik/2a)^2}\, dx

then change the variable x \rightarrow x-ik/2a, so that the integral becomes like the usual Gaussian and the result is \sqrt{\pi/a} e^{-(k/2a)^2}.

3. Nuissance
The problem is that I have changed a real variable x into a complex one, while still keeping the same integration limits, which is plus minus infinity (on the real axis, not the complex plane). I don't see any legal reason behind this. What is more, if we use Euler's formula e^{ikx} = \cos(kx) + i\sin (kx) and integrate the real and imaginary parts separately, the imaginary part vanishes because it's odd with respect to the origin, while cosine in the real part can be expanded as a Taylor series, each term then can be integrated with the Gaussian, we sum back the results and the final formula is exactly the same as with the supposedly illegal completion of the square, so evidently we can complete the square, with a good justification. What is the justification?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You either have to use Cauchy's theorem that says that the contour integral of an analytic function is zero to move the integration path back on the real axis, or you can use the principle of analytic continuation to analytically continue the real Gaussian integral to the complex case.
 
OK, I see that Cauchy's integral theorem can do the trick. Unfortunately I don't have sufficient knowledge of complex analysis, but still I would like to have an elegant solution, as it is part of a bigger problem.
As far as I can understand, I define a contour on a complex plane, then the total integral is zero due to Cauchy, the real line displaced by -ik/2a is my integral, then I also know the Gaussian integral on the real axis, and finally I have two segments at plus and minus real infinity connecting these two lines. How can I show that they cancel?
 
Irid said:
OK, I see that Cauchy's integral theorem can do the trick. Unfortunately I don't have sufficient knowledge of complex analysis, but still I would like to have an elegant solution, as it is part of a bigger problem.
As far as I can understand, I define a contour on a complex plane, then the total integral is zero due to Cauchy, the real line displaced by -ik/2a is my integral, then I also know the Gaussian integral on the real axis, and finally I have two segments at plus and minus real infinity connecting these two lines. How can I show that they cancel?

If you are rigorous, then the integral from minus to plus infinity first has to be written as the integral from minus R to plus R and then you take the limit of R to infinity. You apply Cauchy's theorem on the integrals inside the limits. What you then see is that the contributions of the two line segments from ±R to ±R - ik/(2a) tend to zero in the limit of R to infinity.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K