Complex numbers - residue theorem

hermanni
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Hi all,
I'm trying to solve 4.15 from the attached file, can anyone help? I tried to use residue thm , i.e the integral of f over the curve gamma-r equals winding number of z0 over gamma-r and residue of z0 of f. I can't see how b-a relates to the winding number of z0. Can anyone help please?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot-Complex made simple - Google Books - Mozilla Firefox.png
    Screenshot-Complex made simple - Google Books - Mozilla Firefox.png
    40.5 KB · Views: 539
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If f(z) has a simple pole at z0 then it has the form g(z)/(z-z0) where limit z->z0 g(z)=Res(f,z0). Use that form.
 
hermanni said:
Hi all,
I'm trying to solve 4.15 from the attached file, can anyone help? I tried to use residue thm , i.e the integral of f over the curve gamma-r equals winding number of z0 over gamma-r and residue of z0 of f. I can't see how b-a relates to the winding number of z0. Can anyone help please?

I believe that's not worded properly. I think it should say:

\gamma_r:[a,b]\to z_0 +re^{it},\quad a\leq t \leq b

and keep in mind if f(z) has a simple pole at z_0, it can be written as:

f(z)=\frac{k}{(z-z_0)}+g(z)

where g(z) is analytic at z_0 so substitute that expression into the integral, then integrate it directly over the arc between a and b and let the radius r go to zero.

Also, if g(z) is analytic at z_0 then it's bounded say |g(z)|<M so you could just integrate

\frac{k}{z-z_0}+M

for some finite constant M and then let the radius of the arc go to zero. I mean I'm just about giving it to you right?
 
Last edited:
Thanx a lot guys , I solved the problem :))
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top