Complex numbers - residue theorem

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 3K views
hermanni
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Hi all,
I'm trying to solve 4.15 from the attached file, can anyone help? I tried to use residue thm , i.e the integral of f over the curve gamma-r equals winding number of z0 over gamma-r and residue of z0 of f. I can't see how b-a relates to the winding number of z0. Can anyone help please?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot-Complex made simple - Google Books - Mozilla Firefox.png
    Screenshot-Complex made simple - Google Books - Mozilla Firefox.png
    40.5 KB · Views: 571
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
hermanni said:
Hi all,
I'm trying to solve 4.15 from the attached file, can anyone help? I tried to use residue thm , i.e the integral of f over the curve gamma-r equals winding number of z0 over gamma-r and residue of z0 of f. I can't see how b-a relates to the winding number of z0. Can anyone help please?

I believe that's not worded properly. I think it should say:

[tex]\gamma_r:[a,b]\to z_0 +re^{it},\quad a\leq t \leq b[/tex]

and keep in mind if f(z) has a simple pole at z_0, it can be written as:

[tex]f(z)=\frac{k}{(z-z_0)}+g(z)[/tex]

where g(z) is analytic at z_0 so substitute that expression into the integral, then integrate it directly over the arc between a and b and let the radius r go to zero.

Also, if g(z) is analytic at z_0 then it's bounded say |g(z)|<M so you could just integrate

[tex]\frac{k}{z-z_0}+M[/tex]

for some finite constant M and then let the radius of the arc go to zero. I mean I'm just about giving it to you right?
 
Last edited:
Thanx a lot guys , I solved the problem :))