Complex Representation of Moving EM Waves

rsaad
Messages
76
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Moving in negative x-axis: E1 = E sin(wt + kx)
Moving in right axis: E2 = Esin(wt-kx-θ) moving to right

write complex representation


The Attempt at a Solution



E1= E Im(exp[i*(wt+kx)])
E2= E Im(exp[i*(wt-kx-θ)])

are these correct or do I have to take into account the -i^ for moving to left in E1?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As I understand it, the advantage of writing the wave function in complex form is that a single complex constant encapsulates both the amplitude and the phase. So you should get equations without a separate constant for phase. See e.g. http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/315/Waves/node72.html
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top