Complex Sinusoids Homework: 3.4 x(t) = sin^3(17\pi t)

  • Thread starter Thread starter jordanrs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Sinusoids
jordanrs
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



3.4 Consider the signal x(t) = sin^3(17\pi t)
(a) Express this signal in terms of a sum of complex exponentials.
(b) Simplify this formula to the sum of sines and/or cosines.
(c) What is the fundamental period of x(t)?
(d) Sketch the spectrum for x(t).
(e) Sketch one period of x(t).


Homework Equations



D/K

The Attempt at a Solution



For part (a) i just switched out the sin part for eulers formulad x(t) = \left (\frac {e^{j17\pi t} - e^{-j17\pi t}}{2j} \right )^3 but i don't think that's what is meant as its nota summation.


for (b) i imagine its going to use the double angle formulas but could find a succinct way to break up sin^3(x)

for (c) would the fundamental period be would it just be P = \frac{17\pi}{2\pi} making it just \frac{17}{2}

then the final two steps i have no clue

any help would be most appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

jordanrs said:
for (c) would the fundamental period be would it just be P = \frac{17\pi}{2\pi} making it just \frac{17}{2}

Well let's test that shall we? Let's say that the period T = 17/2. Then at t = T, I should get the same thing that I get at t = 0:

\sin(17 \pi \cdot (17/2)) \neq \sin(0)

Clearly you are doing something wrong. Hint: the factor that multiplies t in the argument of the sine function is not 2pi * period as you have assumed. However, it is 2pi * (something that is related to the period). What is that something?
 
jordanrs said:
For part (a) i just switched out the sin part for eulers formulad x(t) = \left (\frac {e^{j17\pi t} - e^{-j17\pi t}}{2j} \right )^3 but i don't think that's what is meant as its nota summation.

You could just expand the cubic -- that would give you your sum. However, I think that what you are probably expected to do here is to compute a Fourier series decomposition of x(t) in order to get the sum. That is consistent with what you are asked in the other parts. In fact, I would do both, since this is a good way to check your answer. Once you've done that, part (b) should follow immediately by simplification of the sum of complex exponentials. You now have a sum of sines and cosines. In other words, the signal has been decomposed into individual frequency components (sinusoids), and these frequencies that compose the signal are harmonically related to each other.

For part (d), the spectrum of the signal is just a plot that indicates the power in different frequency components. In other words, it is a plot of the Fourier series coefficients as a function of omega (I'm giving away the answer to the question in my first post now ;) ).

For part (e) -- seriously?? Just sketch the function over one cycle.
 
Last edited:
Hello I am new to this forum so please point out any mistakes in general rules I may be over looking.

first sin^3(x) is simple

1/4 (3 sin(x)-sin(3 x))

or (3 Sin[x] - Sin[3 x])/4
or -1/8 i (e^(-i x)-e^(i x))^3


but your equation boils down to : x(t) = 1/4 (3 sin(17 pi t)-sin(51 pi t))
or : x(t) = -1/8 i (e^(-17 i pi t)-e^(17 i pi t))^3
or even: x(t) = sin^3(pi t) (2 cos(2 pi t)+2 cos(4 pi t)+2 cos(6 pi t)+2 cos(8 pi t)+2 cos(10 pi t)+2 cos(12 pi t)+2 cos(14 pi t)+2 cos(16 pi t)+1)^3

I figured the period would be closer to 0.12

the sketch is identical to that of sin^3(x) except compressed to 0-0.12 on the x axis

or maybe i am thinking about this all wrong.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top