Complexity of Solving Multi-Potential Schrodinger Equation?

degerativpart
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Does anyone now how to solve the schrodinger equation for a potenital such that: V1(0<x<a), v2(a<x<b), v3(b<x<c). Also i need to write down the condition which gives the possible energy eigenvalues of a particle in the potential. ITs easily to solve the first potential well but when it starts to introducing the two others I feel like I am messing up. Any help would be nice?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


 
Physics news on Phys.org
You basically do what you would do in a square well, except that you match the wavefunctions at the boundaries. (I'm assuming that v1, v2 and v3 are constants.)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top