Component is diagonal in the basis

  • Thread starter Thread starter vredina97
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basis Component
vredina97
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am analyzing the paper for my thesis and have

Equation

IF=-1*(1+cos(δ))*cot(θ)*σ_2-sin(δ)*cot(θ)*σ_1

where σ_1={{0,1},{1,0}} and σ_2={{0,-i},{i,0}} are the Pauli matrices

The component σ_1 is diagonal in the (1/√2, +/- 1/√2) linear polarization basis and the component σ_2 is diagonal in the circular polarization basis (1/√2, +/- i/√2).

What is mathematical representation of σ_1 and σ_2 being diagonal in that basis.

Thanks in advance,

vredina97
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vredina97 said:
What is mathematical representation of σ_1 and σ_2 being diagonal in that basis.
What do you mean by "that basis"? You refer to two bases, the "linear polarization basis" and the "circular polarization basis". Are you referring to one of those or some other basis?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
The σ_1={{0,1},{1,0}} and σ_2={{0,-i},{i,0}} are the Pauli matrices

I have to find diagonal to σ_1 in the (1/√2, +/- 1/√2) linear polarization basis and diagonal to σ_2 in the circular polarization basis (1/√2, +/- i/√2).

I found that diagonal to σ_1 is {{1,0},{0,-1}} (where 1 and -1 are eigenvalues of σ_1={{0,1},{1,0}}) in {1/√2}{1/√2} and {1/√2}{- 1/√2} basis.

But I have troubles with σ_2={{0,-i},{i,0}} where i get eigenvalues lambda=√-1=√i^2. If eigenvalue is complex then matrix can not be diagonalized? or is there another solution?

Thanks in advance,

vredina97
 
Thread 'Derivation of equations of stress tensor transformation'
Hello ! I derived equations of stress tensor 2D transformation. Some details: I have plane ABCD in two cases (see top on the pic) and I know tensor components for case 1 only. Only plane ABCD rotate in two cases (top of the picture) but not coordinate system. Coordinate system rotates only on the bottom of picture. I want to obtain expression that connects tensor for case 1 and tensor for case 2. My attempt: Are these equations correct? Is there more easier expression for stress tensor...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
6K
Replies
34
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top