Does a Sliding Mass on an Incline Have a Horizontal Acceleration Component?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether a mass sliding down a frictionless incline has a horizontal acceleration component. Participants debate the interpretation of the problem, particularly regarding the choice of the x-axis and the timing of acceleration components. It is suggested that the mass travels a horizontal distance, which could imply an x-component of acceleration, but clarity is needed on whether this applies during the fall or after hitting the ground. The importance of net forces in determining acceleration components is highlighted, along with the need for a clear coordinate system. Ultimately, the question remains about the specific conditions under which the x-component of acceleration is being assessed.
Natalie456
Messages
16
Reaction score
2
1. For the following, the x-axis is not allowed to be set along the ramp. If a mass, starting from rest, slides along a linear, frictionless incline of length D and then falls a distance h to the ground, will it have an x-component of acceleration?

2. Relevant kinematics formulas?

3. I wasn't certain. It does travel a distance of Dcosθ in the horizontal direction. I initially figured that, because it starts at rest and travels this horizontal distance, there must be some component of acceleration in the x-direction, as well as in the y-direction, but, now, I am uncertain. A similar question with the coordinate axis set similarly also confused me.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The way I read the exercise is that you can choose the x-axis in any direction, except along the ramp. Thing to do is make a drawing, choose an x-axis direction and see if the actual acceleration (which way is that pointing ?) has a component along such an x-axis.
 
Natalie456 said:
If a mass, starting from rest, slides along a linear, frictionless incline of length D and then falls a distance h to the ground, will it have an x-component of acceleration?
Is the question asking if it will have an x-component of acceleration after it hits the ground, during the fall to the ground, or at any time during the whole process? Based on the wording, I would interpret it to be asking if it has an x component of acceleration after it hits the ground. But I'm not sure if that's what they meant. But in order to have an x-component of acceleration, there needs to be a net force acting in the x direction. And the result of that will be a change in the x component of velocity.
 
Perhaps I'm being a bit too suspicious (a lot of experience :smile: ?). If the exercise composer meant well, he or she may have thought of only two (the most frequently used) choices of coordinate systems: horizontal or along the incline.
Especially if you (and teacher?) are fairly new to the subject: a reasonable way to read the exercise is:
Natalie456 said:
will it have a horizontal component of acceleration during this last part of the trip
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top