Finding g with a Compound/Physical Pendulum: Plotting and Calculating

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pete2008
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pendulum
AI Thread Summary
To find the acceleration due to gravity using a compound pendulum, the formula T=2π*sqrt(I/mgh) is utilized. The discussion focuses on plotting the period T against the moment of inertia I, as the variable is changed by adjusting the mass along the rod. The relationship can be rearranged into the linear form y=mx+c, where T is on the y-axis and I on the x-axis. The gradient of the resulting line can then be used to calculate g. This method effectively links the physical properties of the pendulum to gravitational acceleration.
Pete2008
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Find the acceleration due to gravity using a compound/phyiscal pendulum. Using the formula: T=2pie*sqrt(I/mgh)

I understand how to find all the variables but to find g, i must plot a graph of T against something (Thats where i need help) and use the gradient of the line to calculate g.

so.

1.What do i plot against T
2.How would i calculate g from the gradient of the line

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Pete and welcome to PF,

Firstly, what is the general equation of a straight line?
 
Hi,

The equation of a staright line is y=mx+c, and i guess that T would be the y axis/ the y part of the equation. Would the x-axis of the graph be I, because that's the variable I am changing by moving the mass along the rod?

Once I know the x and y part of the equation would it just be a case of rearanging the origional formula into y=mx+c?

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Pete2008 said:
Hi,

The equation of a staright line is y=mx+c, and i guess that T would be the y axis/ the y part of the equation. Would the x-axis of the graph be I, because that's the variable I am changing by moving the mass along the rod?

Once I know the x and y part of the equation would it just be a case of rearanging the origional formula into y=mx+c?

Thanks
Absolutely spot on :approve:
 
Thanks alot
 
Pete2008 said:
Thanks alot
No problem, I didn't do anything...:rolleyes:
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top