Compton Effect: Electron Ejection & Potential Energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the Compton Effect and the energy dynamics involved in electron ejection during photon collisions. It questions why the potential energy, or binding energy, of the electron is not considered in the derivation of the Compton effect formula, given that some energy must be used to overcome this binding energy. The participants note that while the photon energy is significantly higher than the binding energy of electrons, leading to the assumption that electrons are at rest, this simplification may overlook important details. The binding energy is typically much lower than the photon energy, allowing for this approximation. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the complexities of energy interactions in the context of the Compton Effect.
vin300
Messages
602
Reaction score
4
The text on wikipedia says that due to compton scattering, the electron is ejected from the atom, but if so, the difference in energies of the two photons will not appear entirely as its kinetic energy, some of it must be used to overcome its potential energy, i.e. binding energy must be supplied to the electron.
The other doubt is that the electron is considered to be at rest before the collision, but I cannot imagine why the electron should be at rest within the atom.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why is the potential energy of the electron not taken into account while deriving the compton effect formula?
 
If you consider the compton effect, the photon energy is usually much larger than the binding energy of most of the electrons. While the photon might have something like 100keV, most electrons are bound with ~100eV or less. Therefore, this energy is neglected, and it can be assumed to be at rest.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top