Compton scattering with off-shell photon

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the modulus of squared amplitude for the process e-γ*→e-γ, involving a virtual photon. The inquiry specifically addresses how to treat a virtual photon in an external leg within Feynman diagrams. It is emphasized that this scenario typically represents a sub-diagram in a broader Feynman diagram, relevant in vacuum quantum field theory (QFT). The need for context regarding the specific physics for which the off-shell amplitude is being calculated is highlighted as essential for providing a comprehensive answer. Understanding the role of external legs in representing asymptotic free states is crucial for progressing in this calculation.
Marioweee
Messages
18
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
Compute the squared modulus of the summed amplitude over the final and initial polarizations of Compton process with a virtual photon.
Relevant Equations
.
How is it treated or what Feymann's rule applies to a virtual photon in an external leg? I would like to calculate the modulus of squared amplitude for the process

e-γ*→e-γ

where the * indicates that the photon is virtual. I've never dealt with virtual particles on a external leg and would like to know how to get started.
Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've no idea, what the goal is. This can only be a sub-diagram in a true Feynman diagram, which in "vacuum QFT" always describes S-matrix elements with external legs symbolizing asymptotic free states. So to answer this question, we'd need the context, for which physics such an "off-shell amplitude" should be calculated.
 
So is there some elegant way to do this or am I just supposed to follow my nose and sub the Taylor expansions for terms in the two boost matrices under the assumption ##v,w\ll 1##, then do three ugly matrix multiplications and get some horrifying kludge for ##R## and show that the product of ##R## and its transpose is the identity matrix with det(R)=1? Without loss of generality I made ##\mathbf{v}## point along the x-axis and since ##\mathbf{v}\cdot\mathbf{w} = 0## I set ##w_1 = 0## to...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
58
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K