Compute the velocity of a free-falling parachutist using Euler's method

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on computing the velocity of a free-falling parachutist using Euler's method, starting with an upward velocity of 20 m/s and transitioning to a drag coefficient of 1.5 kg/m after 10 seconds. Participants emphasize the importance of establishing a consistent sign convention for velocity and gravitational acceleration, noting that downward velocity can be considered positive or negative depending on the chosen convention. The drag force, which opposes the velocity, must also be correctly represented to ensure accurate calculations, particularly when the velocity changes direction. A suggested correction involves using a modified drag equation to account for the sign of the velocity. Overall, clarity in the mathematical approach and physical understanding is crucial for accurate results.
thornear
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For the second order drag model (Eq. 1.8), compute the velocity of a free-falling parachutist using Euler's method for the case where,

m = 80 kg
Cd = .25 kg/m

Perform the calculation from t = 0 to 20 with a step size of 1 s. Use an initial condition that the parachutist has an upward velocity of 20 m/s at t = 0. At t=10 s, assume that the chute is instantaneously deployed so that the drag coefficient jumps to 1.5 kg/m.

Homework Equations



Eq. 1.8,

dv/dt = g-((Cd)/m)*v2

The Attempt at a Solution



Used equation v(ti+1) = v(ti) + [g - (Cd/m)*v(ti)2](ti+1 - ti)v

(Used in example in book, unfortunately no example w/ an initial condition with an "upward velocity" though)

Plugged in the values to achieve,

t = 0... V = 20 + [9.81 - (.25/80)(0)2] *1 = 29.81m/s
t= 1...V = 29.81 + [9.81 - (.25/80)2]*1 = 36.51m/s
t =2....V=36.51 + [9.81-(.25/80)2]*1 = 42.15 m/s
...so on until t = 10 where Cd changes from .25 to 1.5

Am I doing this right? I don't know how the "upward velocity = 20" works into this. I assumed that it is the initial v(ti) as you can see from the first solution I have where t = 0, which may or may not be horribly wrong.

Thanks, much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since you are representing an upward velocity as positive, you must have g as negative here. Try making g negative.
 
Making g negative makes sense to me but it begins to produce negative velocities. Also I made a mistake in the above post,

t = 0... V = 20 + [9.81 - (.25/80)(0)2] *1 = 29.81m/s
t= 1...V = 29.81 + [9.81 - (.25/80)2]*1 = 36.51m/s
t =2....V=36.51 + [9.81-(.25/80)2]*1 = 42.15 m/s
...so on until t = 10 where Cd changes from .25 to 1.5

Should read

t = 0... V = 20 + [9.81 - (.25/80)(0)2] *1 = 29.81m/s
t= 1...V = 29.81 + [9.81 - (.25/80)(29.81)2]*1 = 36.51m/s
t =2....V=36.51 + [9.81-(.25/80)(36.51)2]*1 = 42.15 m/s
...so on until t = 10 where Cd changes from .25 to 1.5

But in looking at that I realize perhaps that v(ti)2 should be 202 initially rather than 02.

Thoughts? Help?

Thanks
 
Let's step back and think about the math here, and the physics as well.

You initially have the parachutist going upwards. Gravitational acceleration is obviously directed downwards. You will need some sign convention on velocity and acceleration to handle this scenario. If you choose the sign convention such that downward velocity is positive, your value for g will be positive and your initial velocity will be negative. If you choose the sign convention such that upward velocity is positive, your value for g will be negative and your initial velocity will be positive.

That is not enough to cover this scenario. The other problem is drag. Drag is always directed against the velocity vector. If your velocity is positive (regardless of sign convention), the drag acceleration must be negative. If your velocity is negative, the drag acceleration must be positive. You have drag acceleration as - (c_d/m)v^2, so it is always negative. This is incorrect for negative velocities. One way to correct this is to compute the drag acceleration as - (c_d/m)(v^3/|v|).
 
  • Like
Likes Mohamed ismail
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top