Computer Engineering or Computer Science Major?

AI Thread Summary
Choosing between a Computer Engineering and Computer Science major involves understanding the focus of each discipline, with computer engineering emphasizing hardware and computer science focusing on software. While both fields require a solid grasp of math, the discussion suggests that a lack of natural aptitude in math shouldn't deter one from pursuing either major. It is emphasized that many computer science concepts can be self-taught through available resources, allowing for a strong foundation in hardware as a computer engineer. The job market is favorable for both majors, and advanced math is not frequently used in many roles. Ultimately, embracing the challenge of math can enhance career opportunities without limiting options.
Computerwiz
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am a Freshman in College as of right now, and I am looking to decide on a major. I am extremely interested in computers, this includes: how they work, finding new things to do with them, and learning how to develop new software. However, I am not the best at math, if I really study hard, i can learn to understand it, but it does not come naturally. This frustrates me because obviously computer science and computer engineering both greatly involve math. Should I go for it and just work on my math? If so, should I major in computer science or computer engineering. Also, which of these would be better for me in my situation and which would give me a better future?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Computer engineering.
 
The difference really comes down to hardware vs. software. Computer engineers deal with the hardware side and computer scientists deal with the software side. Naturally, there is a bit of overlap because you can't really do one without understanding the other to a certain degree.

Having said that, my personal bias is toward computer engineering. You can learn a lot of the computer science concepts by reading the huge amount of published material out there and still have a good foundation as far as hardware goes. Sure, it might take you a good while to get to the same knowledge level as a CS graduate, but you'd have the added benefit of being a computer engineer. With regard to jobs, you'll be able to find work doing either of them.

Also, if your limiting factor is math, I'd say just bite the bullet. Unless you're planning on doing physical simulations, the chances of using advanced math every day are remote. There's no reason to limit your career options based on that.
 
You just have to find the beauty in math to make studying easier. Besides calculus (1-3), you should only need 2 or 3 more maths after that (linear algebra and diff. equations) depending on the school
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top