Computing Expectation Values: What Makes Sense?

gulsen
Messages
215
Reaction score
0
How much sense does it make to compute expectation value of an observable in a limited interval? i.e.

\int_a^b \psi^* \hat Q \psi dx.
rather than
\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \psi \hat Q \psi dx

Apparently, it shouldn't make any sense for it gives weird results when you compute e.v. of momentum for a part of infinite potentital well (say well is [0,a] and you do the e.v. integral from [0,a/3]]). Why do we have to integrate over all the space then?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the position representation, \psi (x) is well defined on all real axis, even though the system might be constrained to "move" in a box.

Daniel.
 
you must integrate over entire space!
For infinite potential, there in no leak for
wavefunction beyond the potential boundary.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top