Computing the age of the universe at the big crunch

uppiemurphy
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider a universe where there are two types of matter: dust and curvature. The density of dust evolves with time as ρdust(t) = ρ0R(t)^(−3) and curvature evolves as ρcurvature = −kR(t)^(-2) where ρ0 and k are constants.

The Friedmann equation is:
H^2 = [(8∏G)/3][ρdust + ρcurvature] (where H^2 = (Rdot/R)^2 )

Consider the case where k is positive (this describes a closed sphere). Imagine that the universe starts out with zero size at time t = 0 – i.e. at the big bang – and begins expanding. Show that at some point the universe will reach a maximum size, before proceeding to collapse to zero size in a ”big crunch.” Compute the age of the universe at the big crunch.

Homework Equations



I know that ρdust + ρcurvature > ρcritical where ρcritical = 3H^2/(8∏G) other than that I am unsure if any other equations would be useful, and whether even this one is.

The Attempt at a Solution



OK I have come up with an integral expression for the amount of time t, it takes for the universe to evolve from a size R1 to a size R2.
this integral is:

t = 1/sqrt((8∏G)/3) ∫ dR/sqrt(ρ0/R -k) . Is this expression useful? It is a difficult integral to solve... I think if I evaluated this integral from 0 to Rmax I would be able to find the time t of the universe at the "big crunch"

Is there an easier way to go about this or am I on the correct path?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you find the time (or redshift, or scale factor) when expansion stops and collapsing starts? That might be of some use.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top