Concept Problem: Oscillation and friction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the minimum coefficient of static friction required to prevent a block from slipping on an oscillating surface. The user proposes that slipping occurs when the acceleration of the surface is at its maximum, specifically when ωt=π/2. They derive an expression for kinetic friction, mistakenly yielding a negative coefficient. Participants clarify that the correct analysis should involve static friction and emphasize the need for a positive value for the coefficient of friction. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying friction concepts in oscillatory motion scenarios.
cjavier
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
So I feel as though I have the correct solution, but am not positive. My problem is as follows: A block of mass M is at rest with respect to a surface which oscillates horizontally with sinusoidal motion described by the equation x(t)=Asin(ωt). Find an expression for the minimum value of the coefficient of static friction between the block and surface so that the block does not slip as the surface oscillates. ALSO: If the block were to slip, where in the oscillation would this happen?

I stated that if the block were to slip, it would be when x''(t) is at a maximum. The expression for x''(t) is -ω2Asin(ωt) and so when ωt=/2, the acceleration is at it's max, because the sine is at 1.

And I set the kinetic force equal to this expression for acceleration times the mass of the block. Like so: Mgμk = -ω2A.

I finished with μk = 2A / g
Let me know if you feel as though I am correct. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Overall, that looks very good. But are you dealing with kinetic friction or static friction?

(In your force equation, I think you left out the mass on the right side. But, I believe that's just a typing error.)
 
TSny said:
Overall, that looks very good. But are you dealing with kinetic friction or static friction?

(In your force equation, I think you left out the mass on the right side. But, I believe that's just a typing error.)

Static friction, and yes I did, thank you
 
The coefficient of friction should be a positive number. So, you should consider how you ended up with a negative value.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top