Concept Problem: Oscillation and friction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the minimum coefficient of static friction required to prevent a block from slipping on an oscillating surface. The user proposes that slipping occurs when the acceleration of the surface is at its maximum, specifically when ωt=π/2. They derive an expression for kinetic friction, mistakenly yielding a negative coefficient. Participants clarify that the correct analysis should involve static friction and emphasize the need for a positive value for the coefficient of friction. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying friction concepts in oscillatory motion scenarios.
cjavier
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
So I feel as though I have the correct solution, but am not positive. My problem is as follows: A block of mass M is at rest with respect to a surface which oscillates horizontally with sinusoidal motion described by the equation x(t)=Asin(ωt). Find an expression for the minimum value of the coefficient of static friction between the block and surface so that the block does not slip as the surface oscillates. ALSO: If the block were to slip, where in the oscillation would this happen?

I stated that if the block were to slip, it would be when x''(t) is at a maximum. The expression for x''(t) is -ω2Asin(ωt) and so when ωt=/2, the acceleration is at it's max, because the sine is at 1.

And I set the kinetic force equal to this expression for acceleration times the mass of the block. Like so: Mgμk = -ω2A.

I finished with μk = 2A / g
Let me know if you feel as though I am correct. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Overall, that looks very good. But are you dealing with kinetic friction or static friction?

(In your force equation, I think you left out the mass on the right side. But, I believe that's just a typing error.)
 
TSny said:
Overall, that looks very good. But are you dealing with kinetic friction or static friction?

(In your force equation, I think you left out the mass on the right side. But, I believe that's just a typing error.)

Static friction, and yes I did, thank you
 
The coefficient of friction should be a positive number. So, you should consider how you ended up with a negative value.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top