Conceptual question about Lorentz transformations

tnedde
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am a newcomer to relativity, currently studying the subject on my own, via Modern Physics by Bernstein et al. I have a question based on pgs 57-58 of the text.

Suppose that two reference frames S and S' are similarly oriented, and S' is moving with constant velocity v in the positive x-direction relative to S. Let their origins coincide at time t = 0, and suppose that at that moment, a light pulse is sent out from the origin. After time t', an observer in S' sees the light pulse hit both the point (ct', 0, 0) and the point (0, ct', 0), simultaneously. An observer in S also watches these events unfold, but they are not simultaneous to her. My question is: which happens first for her?

Let t_x be the time in S of the pulse reaching the point (ct', 0, 0) in S'; likewise let t_y be the time in S of the pulse reaching (0, ct', 0) in S'. The Lorentz transformations seem to indicate that t_x > t_y, but my intuition says it should be the other way around. My reasoning is thus: In the S frame, the S' frame appears Lorentz-contracted in the x-direction. Thus the point (ct', 0, 0) in S' should appear closer to the origin of S' than the point (0, ct', 0). But because the observer in S (and indeed, in any inertial reference frame) observes the speed of light to be the same in all directions, the pulse should reach the (seemingly closer) point on the x'-axis before it reaches the (seemingly farther) point on the y'-axis.

Can anyone clear this up?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tnedde said:
My reasoning is thus: In the S frame, the S' frame appears Lorentz-contracted in the x-direction. Thus the point (ct', 0, 0) in S' should appear closer to the origin of S' than the point (0, ct', 0). But because the observer in S (and indeed, in any inertial reference frame) observes the speed of light to be the same in all directions, the pulse should reach the (seemingly closer) point on the x'-axis before it reaches the (seemingly farther) point on the y'-axis.
It's certainly true that the x' axis appears contracted in the S frame, but what you've forgotten is that S' is moving. Figure out the path that the light takes along the x' and y' axes as seen in S, then you can compute the travel time for each.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top