Conceptual Question For Vectors

AI Thread Summary
For three vectors to sum to zero, their magnitudes must satisfy specific geometric relationships. The discussion emphasizes that the vectors can form a triangle, where the sum of the lengths of any two sides must be greater than or equal to the length of the third side. This leads to the conclusion that option e is correct: the sum of two magnitudes must be greater than or equal to the third. The idea of visualizing the vectors as forming a triangle helps clarify their relationships. Understanding these geometric principles is crucial for solving vector addition problems effectively.
willmac
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
For three vectors to add up to zero, what must be true of the magnitudes of the three vectors? Hint: Draw a diagram of the addition of three vectors to make a vector of zero length. Think of what geometrical relationship they must have.
a. All the magnitudes must be equal.
b. One of the magnitudes must be greater than the sum of the other two.
c. One of the magnitudes must be at least twice as great as each of the other two.
d. One of the magnitudes must be less than the difference of the other two.
e. The sum of two of the magnitudes must be greater than or equal to the third for all three vectors.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi willmac welcome to PF

What geometrical relationship do you think they must have?
 
I feel like they are going to make a right triangle, but I was thinking the answer was e. If the vectors go in opposite directions well at least one of the longest ones has to be negative and the other two have to add up in order to be equivalent to the longest one so when the vectors combine they make zero.
 
Well, does it have to be a right triangle? If the sum of some set of vectors equals zero, that means that they end up where they started, basically.

But thinking about it as a triangle is the right way to go I think. Imagine some triangles, like a right triangle and an equilateral triangle, ones where you know the relationship between the lengths of their sides. Then apply those options to those triangles and see which rule works for all the triangles you can think of.
 
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top