Conceptual Question For Vectors

AI Thread Summary
For three vectors to sum to zero, their magnitudes must satisfy specific geometric relationships. The discussion emphasizes that the vectors can form a triangle, where the sum of the lengths of any two sides must be greater than or equal to the length of the third side. This leads to the conclusion that option e is correct: the sum of two magnitudes must be greater than or equal to the third. The idea of visualizing the vectors as forming a triangle helps clarify their relationships. Understanding these geometric principles is crucial for solving vector addition problems effectively.
willmac
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
For three vectors to add up to zero, what must be true of the magnitudes of the three vectors? Hint: Draw a diagram of the addition of three vectors to make a vector of zero length. Think of what geometrical relationship they must have.
a. All the magnitudes must be equal.
b. One of the magnitudes must be greater than the sum of the other two.
c. One of the magnitudes must be at least twice as great as each of the other two.
d. One of the magnitudes must be less than the difference of the other two.
e. The sum of two of the magnitudes must be greater than or equal to the third for all three vectors.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi willmac welcome to PF

What geometrical relationship do you think they must have?
 
I feel like they are going to make a right triangle, but I was thinking the answer was e. If the vectors go in opposite directions well at least one of the longest ones has to be negative and the other two have to add up in order to be equivalent to the longest one so when the vectors combine they make zero.
 
Well, does it have to be a right triangle? If the sum of some set of vectors equals zero, that means that they end up where they started, basically.

But thinking about it as a triangle is the right way to go I think. Imagine some triangles, like a right triangle and an equilateral triangle, ones where you know the relationship between the lengths of their sides. Then apply those options to those triangles and see which rule works for all the triangles you can think of.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top