Conceptual question on greens theorem/line integrals

Mdhiggenz
Messages
324
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Hey guys,

I just wanted to know, if it would be an incorrect assumption to say that greens theorem is directly correlated to a line integral.

The reason I am assuming that is because the formula for a line integral in my calc text is

∫f(x,y)dx+g(x,y)=∫f(x,y)dx+∫g(x,y)dy
c c c

Which is simply the left side of greens theorem.

I also am having a hard time putting the similarities between all three theorems. Greens, divergence, and stokes together in terms of what they all have in common.

Thanks

Higgenz


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Greens theorem is strict, the relation is true with a simple CLOSED contour but not in general. Take the line integral of a contour that isn't closed or simple and greens theorem will fail.
 
How would we know if it fails?
 
Mdhiggenz said:
How would we know if it fails?

Small things like discontinuous functions would cause it to fail, if the contour isn't closed then it will most likely fail, if the contour is too complicated (it overlaps) then it will probably fail.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top