Concerning Subspaces of Infinite Dimensional Vector Spaces

mathstew
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I have a question concerning subspaces of infinite dimensional vector spaces. Specifically given any infinite dimensional vector space V, how might one construct an infinite decreasing chain of subspaces?

That is:

V=V0\supseteqV1\supseteq... , where each Vi is properly contained in Vi-1.

I know such chains must exist and I suspect that they should be easily constructed, however I am not familiar enough with infinite dimensional vector spaces to be confident with my attempts thus far.


Thanks for any help given!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Select a basis for the vector space. This should be finite, so we can select a countable chain \{e_1,e_2,e_3,e_4,...\} of basis elements.

Then

span\{e_1\}\subseteq span\{e_1,e_2\}\subseteq span \{e_1,e_2,e_3\}\subseteq ...

is an infinite chain of subspaces.
 
micromass said:
Select a basis for the vector space. This should be finite, so we can select a countable chain \{e_1,e_2,e_3,e_4,...\} of basis elements.

Then

span\{e_1\}\subseteq span\{e_1,e_2\}\subseteq span \{e_1,e_2,e_3\}\subseteq ...

is an infinite chain of subspaces.

Thanks!

So I suppose that with your notation:

V = span\{e_1,e_2,...\}\supseteq span\{e_2,e_3,...\}\supseteq... will give me the infinite decreasing chain as desired.

Thanks again for your help!

EDIT: On second thought, can I be assured that such a chain will not stabilize? It is clear in your construction for building increasing chains but it seems less intuitive for building a decreasing chain in such a way.
 
Last edited:
If the e_i are components in a basis, then e_n is not in the span of {e_(n+1), e_(n+2),... }, so each inclusion will be proper.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top