Condition for resolution of two point sources of light

  • Thread starter Thread starter songoku
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resolution
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the Rayleigh Criterion for resolving two point sources of light, expressed by the formula θ = 1.22 λ/b, where b is the diameter of the circular aperture. Some participants initially believed the formula should be θ ≥ 0.61 λ/r, based on the relationship between diameter and radius. However, it is clarified that for resolution, the correct approach is to consider the diameter (D) directly in the formula, leading to the conclusion that D = 2r. The consensus confirms that the correct interpretation aligns with the original formula, emphasizing the importance of using the diameter for accurate calculations. Understanding these parameters is crucial for resolving light sources effectively.
songoku
Messages
2,471
Reaction score
386
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
##\theta=1.22 \frac{\lambda}{b}##
1712282564500.png


The formula is ##\theta=1.22 \frac{\lambda}{b}## where b is the diameter of circular aperture

I thought it would be ##\theta \geq 0.61 \frac{\lambda}{r}## since diameter = 2 x radius but the answer is (D)

Do we just consider ##r \approx b## since maybe it is small or am I missing something else?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
songoku said:
Homework Statement: Please see below
Relevant Equations: ##\theta=1.22 \frac{\lambda}{b}##

View attachment 342834

The formula is ##\theta=1.22 \frac{\lambda}{b}## where b is the diameter of circular aperture

I thought it would be ##\theta \geq 0.61 \frac{\lambda}{r}## since diameter = 2 x radius but the answer is (D)

Do we just consider ##r \approx b## since maybe it is small or am I missing something else?

Thanks
I agree with you.

The Rayleigh Criterion says that when two distant lights sources (wavelength, ##\lambda\,##) are viewed through a circular aperture of diameter, ##D##, they may be resolved provided that there angular separation, ##\theta## (in radians) is such that

##\displaystyle \quad \quad \theta \ge 1.22 \dfrac{\lambda}{D} \ .##

Since ##D=2r## , I agree that the correct answer is C) .
 
Thank you very much SammyS
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top