Condition satisified when the body does not slide

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the condition under which a body (m2) on a sledge (m1) does not slide while being pulled by a force (F). The key point is that the static friction must exceed the tension in the string connected to another sledge (m3). The initial calculations led to confusion regarding the correct expression for static friction and tension. The correct relationship involves understanding the net forces acting on m2, factoring in both the tension and the frictional force. Ultimately, the friction must balance the resultant force for m2 to remain stationary relative to m1.
Eugen
Messages
22
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



A sledge of mass m1 is pulled horizontally with a force F. On the sledge there is a body of mass m2 that can slide on the horizontal platform of the sledge with the friction coefficient μ. Another sledge of mass m3 is tied with a horizontal string of the body m2. Between the sledges and the snow the friction is negligible. Find the condition that is satisfied when the
m2 body does not slide.

Homework Equations


fs = μN

T = [m2/(m1 + m2)]*F

The Attempt at a Solution


I assumed that μ is the coefficient of static friction. If the m2 body is not to slide, the static friction between this body and the m1 sledge must be bigger than the tension in the string.
The tension in the string should be:

T = [m3/(m1 + m2 + m3)] * F

and the static friction:

f = m2

m2gμ > [m3/(m1 + m2 + m3)] * F

This gives:

μ > F/m2g * [m3/(m1 + m2 + m3)]

but the book answers say that:

μ > F/m2g * [(m3 + m2)/(m1 + m2 + m3)]

What is wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Eugen said:
If the m2 body is not to slide, the static friction between this body and the m1 sledge must be bigger than the tension in the string.
Draw a free body diagram for m2 and set up the second law for m2. This will give you the correct relation between the static friction force, the tension, and the acceleration.
 
The acceleration of the system is F/(m1 + m2 + m3). This means that horizontally, in the positive direction, on m2 acts the force:

F' = m2 F/(m1 + m2 + m3)

The tension acts horizontally in the negative direction:

T = - m3F/(m1 + m2 + m3)

So, on m2 acts horizontally this force:

Fr = F(m2 - m3)/(m1 + m2 + m3)

which can be positive or negative. The friction should compensate for the resultant force, so it should be positive and equal in magnitude with the tension.

But, the solution says that
μ > F/m2g * [(m2 + m3)(m1 + m2 + m3)]

which in my opinion means that the friction should be bigger that the F' + T. I don't understand where this sum comes.
 
Last edited:
Eugen said:
The acceleration of the system is F/(m1 + m2 + m3). This means that horizontally, in the positive direction, on m2 acts the force:

F' = m2 F/(m1 + m2 + m3)
Yes, that represents m2a. So it must equal the net force acting horizontally on m2. That is, it equals ∑Fx.

The tension acts horizontally in the negative direction:

T = - m3F/(m1 + m2 + m3)
Yes.

So, on m2 acts horizontally this force:

Fr = F(m2 - m3)/(m1 + m2 + m3)
There is a sign error here. Start with ∑Fx = m2ax. On the left side, add all the x-components of the forces acting on m2, taking into account the signs of the x-components. Then solve for Fr.

The friction should compensate for the resultant force, so it should be positive and equal in magnitude with the tension.
If the friction force is equal in magnitude to the tension force (but opposite in direction), would m2 have any acceleration?
 
  • Like
Likes Eugen
Oh. Now I get it. The force acting on m2 is the resultant of tension and friction, the friction being in the positive direction:

-m3F/(m1 + m2 + m3) + m2gμ = m2F/(m1 + m2 + m3)

Thank you.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top