How do charges behave in a spherical conducting shell?

  • Thread starter Thread starter FrogPad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conducting Shell
AI Thread Summary
In a spherical conducting shell with a positive point charge Q at its center, a negative charge of -Q is induced on the inner surface, while a positive charge of +Q appears on the outer surface. This occurs because the electric field from the central charge influences the free electrons in the conductor, causing them to redistribute. If a negative charge is placed at the center, the inner surface will have a positive charge induced, and the outer surface will have a negative charge. When a charge is placed outside the shell, the same principles apply, as the conductor's surface will respond to maintain zero electric field within the conductor. Understanding the symmetry and charge distribution is crucial for visualizing these effects, especially in non-centered configurations.
FrogPad
Messages
801
Reaction score
0
I never really understood this...

Lets say we have a positive point charge Q at the center of a spherical conducting shell of an inner radius Ri and an outer radius R0.

Now my books says that an amount of negative charge equal to -Q must be induced on the inner shell surface (R=Ri), and that an amount of positve .
charge +Q is induced on the outer shell surface (R=R0).

Why is this?

What would happen if a negative point charge was placed in the center?
I would assume that the inner shell would have an induced positve charge, and the outer shell would have an induced negative charge. Again, why is this?

Also what would happen if there was no charge at the center, and instead a charge was placed on the outside of the shell near the conducting surface?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The main reason for this is because an isolated conductor cannot cannot have electric field lines within them. A simple application of Gauss' law ( reread that :)) should give you all the answers.

Cheers
Nithin
 
What I wasn't understanding is why there is an induced charge on the surface of the shells. After thinking about it some more, I think I have I remember why it happens. Since the outer electrons are free to dissociate themselves they are effected by an electric field. So when we place the +Q point charge in the center, all the free negative charge is pulled towards the +Q. On the other hand the positve charge in the shell moves as far away from the +Q as possible, this happens to be the bounds of the shell.

A similar argument can be made for placing a negative charge inside the shell, or any charge outside of the shell.

I guess my problem is visualizing the symmetry. Yes, I can visualize the charge arrangment in this case. But, what happens if we place the near a conducting wall that is not centered (R \new 0). From my argument above I would conclude that negative charge would get as close as possible to the +Q point charge, and positve charge would form on the surface. However this would produce a non-uniform electric field around the conducting shell, and we would need some more information, because the charges on the conducting shell are not cancelling nicely.

Is this logic correct?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top