Conducting wire with cylindrical hole, Please help

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the magnetic field inside a cylindrical conductor with a cylindrical hole. The conductor has a radius R and the hole has a radius of R/2, with a uniform current I flowing out of the screen. The approach involves using Ampere's law and superposition by treating the conductor as two wires: one larger with a positive current and a smaller with an equal but negative current. The main challenge is determining the limits for the area integral in polar coordinates to find the magnetic field at an arbitrary point inside the cavity. The solution hinges on correctly setting up the integral to account for the contributions from both sections of the conductor.
christof6869
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The conductor is cylindrically shaped with a radius of R. The hole on the inside is also cylindrically shaped with a radius of R/2. If a cross-section of this conductor is placed on an x-y coordinate plane, the hole would be centered on the x-axis at a distance of R/2 from the origin. See the attached figure. There is a current going through the conductor "out of the screen" or toward us, given as I, and it is uniformly distributed throughout the filled region. I need to find the magnetic field at any arbitrary point P inside the cavity.


Homework Equations


I know that this is an ampere's law problem similar to finding the magnetic field inside a cylindrical wire. You consider the radius of the closed loop to be less than the outer radius of the wire and, since the current is uniform, the field ends up being equivalent to the permeability of free space constant times the current enclosed multiplied by the ratio of areas.

B=mu0I x (r2/R2)

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to go about this by imagining the wire to be a combination of two wires, where wire 1 is a larger, circular wire with the current I and the smaller circular wire has the same current in the opposite direction. By combining the two you get a hole with no current of the desired geometry. See Figure 2.

For the larger wire, a smaller radius r is used, this allows us to find the magnetic field due to the filled region of a radius r centered at the origin. I know it will be tangential to the loop I chose and that the result is going to be the same as the one in the given equations.

For the smaller wire, the loop is going to be arcing through the cross section at some arbitrary distance equivalent to r. If I convert this to polar coordinates, the area is pretty easy to find.

x=cos(theta)
y=sin(theta)
r=x2+y2

The wire can be represented by the polar equation for a circle centered on the x-axis with radius R/2.

r1 = 2(R/2)cos(theta) = Rcos(theta)

and the loop "arcing" through the circle is simply a circle, so...

r2= r

Now here's where things get sticky. In order to set up the area integral, I need to find the limits. I think I can do this by setting r1 and r2 equal to each other.

Rcos(theta) = r

cos(theta) = r/R

I want an arc who's cosine ratio is r/R and there are two angles that are equal and opposite, but I don't know how to represent them as two definite limits. This is the problem I'm having.

Once I do that integral, I'll be able to use superposition of the two tangential vectors for magnetic field lines at any arbitrary point by subtracting the magnetic field of wire 2 from wire 1.

B = B1 - B2
= mu0 (Ienclosed_1 - Ienclosed_2)
= mu0 (I x (r2/R2) - Ienclosed_2)

And that should give me what I need. Since the current is uniform throughout, I'm able to do it this way. If it wasn't I believe I would need a more general way of doing it.
 

Attachments

  • cylindrical hole.jpg
    cylindrical hole.jpg
    3.2 KB · Views: 533
  • Figure 2.jpg
    Figure 2.jpg
    5.5 KB · Views: 411
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
So I guess my ultimate question is how do I determine the limits and set up the integral using polar coordinates?
 
did you get a reply for this?
 
christof6869 said:

Homework Statement


The conductor is cylindrically shaped with a radius of R. The hole on the inside is also cylindrically shaped with a radius of R/2. If a cross-section of this conductor is placed on an x-y coordinate plane, the hole would be centered on the x-axis at a distance of R/2 from the origin. See the attached figure. There is a current going through the conductor "out of the screen" or toward us, given as I, and it is uniformly distributed throughout the filled region. I need to find the magnetic field at any arbitrary point P inside the cavity.


Homework Equations


I know that this is an ampere's law problem similar to finding the magnetic field inside a cylindrical wire. You consider the radius of the closed loop to be less than the outer radius of the wire and, since the current is uniform, the field ends up being equivalent to the permeability of free space constant times the current enclosed multiplied by the ratio of areas.

B=mu0I x (r2/R2)

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to go about this by imagining the wire to be a combination of two wires, where wire 1 is a larger, circular wire with the current I and the smaller circular wire has the same current in the opposite direction. By combining the two you get a hole with no current of the desired geometry. See Figure 2.
The total current needs to be I, so the current in the larger wire should be 4I/3 and the current in the smaller wire should be -I/3.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top