How Do You Calculate Temperature at a Depth Based on Surface Conduction Rates?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mm2424
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conduction Rate
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the temperature at a depth of 35 km based on surface conduction rates, the average energy conduction rate is 54 mW/m^2 and the thermal conductivity of near-surface rocks is 2.5 W/mK. The formula for conduction rate, P = kA(Th-Tc)/L, requires the area A to be expressed in square meters, typically assumed to be 1 m^2 for simplicity. This assumption leads to a calculated temperature of 766 C at the specified depth. The discussion highlights the importance of unit consistency and clarifies that the formula provides power, not power per square meter, emphasizing that doubling the area would double the power output. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurate temperature calculations at depth.
mm2424
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The average rate at which energy is conducted outward through the ground surface in North America is 54 mW/m^2, and the average thermal conductivity of the near-surface rocks is 2.5 W/mK. Assuming a surface temperature of 10 C, find the temperature at a depth of 35 km. Ignore the heat generated by the presence of radioactive elements.


Homework Equations


P = kA(Th-Tc)/L

where P is the conduction rate
k = thermal conductivity
A = face area
L = thickness
Th = temperature of hot reservoir
Tc = temperature of cold reservoir

The Attempt at a Solution



I can plug all values into the equation for conduction rate except for A. Is there something I'm missing in terms of the surface area for this problem? In the answers I've seen online, people seem to assume A is 1m^2. However, I can't figure out why that assumption is made. (The answer seems to be 766 C, which is found using A=1m^2).

Thanks for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could apply the formula to any area you like.
But if you are going to use the 54 mW/m^2 you must express A in m^2 as well.
In the old days we used to put in the units for all quantities and check to make sure they worked out the same on both sides of a formula. That took too much time, but when in doubt, it is still worth doing occasionally.
 
But if we had arbitrarily chosen an A of 2 m^2, wouldn't the answer to this question be different? The only quantity that would change in the equation would be A, no? I'm confused because the problem doesn't seem to tell you how large of an area we're considering, whereas the solution seems to automatically use a value of 1 m^2.
 
Oops, I gave you a dumb answer!
When you work out the units on the right side, taking k to be in W/mK, you get Watts.
That formula is giving you the power, not the power per square meter as the wording of the question implies. It is only natural that if you double the area, you get double the power flowing through.

Mix up in formulas? The formula is given as ΔQ/ΔT = kA*ΔT here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_conductivity#Equations
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top