How Do Charges Distribute Between Concentric Spheres When Connected by a Wire?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GwtBc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conductor
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the distribution of charge between two concentric metal spheres when connected by a wire. The smaller sphere has a charge of 3.7 μC, and the larger sphere has a charge of 13 μC. Using Gauss' law, it is established that when connected, all charge will move to the larger sphere, resulting in a total charge of 16.7 μC distributed between them. The potential difference between the spheres can be calculated by integrating the electric field from infinity to the surface of the larger sphere. The key takeaway is that the potential at the surface of a charged conducting sphere is uniform, and like charges repel, influencing their distribution when connected.
GwtBc
Messages
74
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


A metal sphere with charge q=3.7 μC and radius r=3.1 cm is concentric with a larger metal sphere with charge Q=13 μC and radius R=5.6 cm. (a) What is the magnitude of the potential difference between the spheres? If we connect the spheres with a wire, what then is the charge on (b) the smaller sphere and (c) the larger sphere?

Homework Equations


[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't know what the answer is, but if I find an expression for the electric field outside the larger conductor using Gauss' law and then integrate that from infinity to 0.056, then find the potential at the surface of the second conductor by simply using q/4*pi*epsilonnaught*r I should have the correct potentials at both surfaces, and for the second part the constraints are that the electric field between the two conductors is zero and q+Q= 16.7e-6 C?

edit: I just realized that according to Gauss' law, all the charge must move on to the larger sphere once they two are connected (since E_inside = 0). Not sure if I can make sense of this result, could someone please explain?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The potential at the surface of a charged conducting sphere is the same as if all the charge were confined at the center.
When the spheres are connected, remember that like charges repel... so they will try to get as far apart as possible.
 
Simon Bridge said:
The potential at the surface of a charged conducting sphere is the same as if all the charge were confined at the center.
When the spheres are connected, remember that like charges repel... so they will try to get as far apart as possible.
Not sure where you're going with the second point.
 
The second point is in response to this:
I just realized that according to Gauss' law, all the charge must move on to the larger sphere once they two are connected (since E_inside = 0). Not sure if I can make sense of this result, could someone please explain?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top