Confirm that e^2 x coulomb's constant=1

  • Thread starter Thread starter yungwun22
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Coulomb's constant, represented as kappa, is defined as 1/(4*pi*epsilon naught), with epsilon naught being 8.85 x 10^-12 F/m. The discussion clarifies that e refers to the elementary charge. Participants confirm that e^2 multiplied by kappa does not equal 1, contradicting the initial assumption. The confusion arises from the values being used, suggesting that the issue may lie in the units or constants applied. The conclusion is that e^2 multiplied by Coulomb's constant does not equal 1.
yungwun22
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm not really sure how to go about this

Homework Equations



whenever I plug in the correct values I don't get 1. Unless I'm supposed to use au.

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
yungwun22 said:

Homework Statement


I'm not really sure how to go about this

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

Well what is Coulomb's constant?

Am I correct in assuming that e is the elementary charge?
 
it's 1/(4*pi*episolon naught) where episolon naught is 8.85 x 10^-12 F/m. yes, e is the elementary charge.
 
yungwun22 said:
it's 1/(4*pi*episolon naught) where episolon naught is 8.85 x 10^-12 F/m. yes, e is the elementary charge.
Then there is nothing left to do since as you have now pointed out in your edited opening post, it is clear that

e^2 \cdot\kappa \neq 1
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top