Confused on why magnetic hard drive bits are written as wave stuctures.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the wave-like structure of data written to magnetic hard drive platters, specifically addressing the concepts of magnetoresistance, including AMR and GMR. Participants highlight that while all signals can be considered wave-like, efficient data storage requires minimizing bandwidth waste, leading to the use of complex encoding schemes such as Modified Frequency Modulation (MFM). Understanding how varying magnetic fields translate into distinguishable signals at the read head is crucial for grasping data storage efficiency.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of magnetoresistance, specifically AMR and GMR
  • Knowledge of data encoding techniques, particularly Modified Frequency Modulation (MFM)
  • Familiarity with the principles of magnetic fields and signal processing
  • Basic concepts of binary data representation and bandwidth utilization
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of magnetoresistance in detail
  • Study the Modified Frequency Modulation (MFM) encoding scheme
  • Explore advanced data encoding techniques for hard drives
  • Learn about the relationship between signal processing and magnetic field variations
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for hardware engineers, data storage specialists, and anyone interested in the technical aspects of magnetic hard drive technology and data encoding efficiency.

Llama77
Messages
113
Reaction score
0
I understand the general aspects of how a hard disk drives works. I have gone deeper and have learned about the various types of magnetoresistance, both AMR and GMR. I understand the fundamentals of how these systems work compared to older units.

But people keep telling me that the data that is actually written to the platters ferromagnetic material is in the form of a wave like structure.


id like to better understand this, thank you.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Any varying signal is basically a wave, to record it in binary = ones and zero = a wave with sharp edges, this takes more bandwidth.
To get the most data in the least space you want to minimize wasted bandwidth - this means the smoothest signal that is distinguishable from a pure tone.
 
Im still a bit confused. So any signal is wave like, so all magnetic fields are wave like? If they are wave like, how does the system tell them apart.
 
Last edited:
The data is a time varying signal at the read head and a position varying magnetic field on the disc.
You could record them as a series of ones and zeros but as we desccribed that is an inneficient use of the bandwidth.
The encoding schemes are very complex in practice - the simplest is probably MFM (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modified_Frequency_Modulation)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
16K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K