Confusing Introductory Electricity Question

AI Thread Summary
To achieve a net electrostatic force of zero on particle 3, it must be positioned on the x-axis, specifically to the left of particles 1 and 2 due to the stronger negative charge of particle 2. The principle of superposition applies, indicating that if particle 3 is equidistant from both particles, the forces exerted by particles 1 and 2 will cancel each other out. The charge of particle 3 is unknown, complicating the calculation of its exact position. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the forces involved and the application of superposition in electrostatics. Overall, the key takeaway is the need for particle 3 to be strategically placed to balance the forces from the other two charges.
jedjj
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In the figure, particle 1 of charge +1.0 µC and particle 2 of charge -2.5 µC, are held at separation L = 7.0 cm on an x axis. If particle 3 of unknown charge q3 is to be located such that the net electrostatic force on it from particles 1 and 2 is zero, what must be the coordinates of particle 3?
x = ? cm
y = ? cm

the figure is not necessary for the question if you know that particle 2 is to the right of particle 1.

Homework Equations



F=\frac{kq_1q_2}{d^2}
k=8.99\times10^{9}

The Attempt at a Solution



Because both particles are on the x axis, to net zero force it must be on the x axis, therefore the y value is 0, and that is correct. I have attempted to use my force equation and found the value as 4.592N(in the negative direction), but that doesn't tell me anything. I also realize that the negative charge is stronger so particle 3 is going to be to the left of the two particles.

Without knowing the charge on particle 3 how can I find this distance?



Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Principle of super position works
 
I haven't done a super position problem yet as this course just started a week ago. Can you explain how I would use it here?
EDIT: we covered the idea quickly, but I don't understand how to use it.

EDIT: nevermind. I wasn't looking hard enough through the notes. Sorry!
 
Last edited:
Basically if particle 3 is equally distant from particle 1 and particle 2, which are in opposite directions of particle the force of the two particles will "cancel out" on particle 3.

It's the same when you did gravity, where the force of gravity on a system of particles follows that same rule.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top