Why Can't I Sum Potentials in Electrostatics Problem?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics problem involving the summation of potentials from a point charge and its image charge near a grounded conducting plane. The user is struggling to simplify the expression for the potential, particularly when trying to find a common denominator for the terms involved. Despite feeling rusty in math, they seek guidance on how to approach the summation effectively. Responses suggest that the current form may be the simplest achievable and emphasize the importance of reviewing algebra skills to manage the complexity. Overall, the conversation highlights challenges in applying mathematical techniques to electrostatics problems.
Beer-monster
Messages
285
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm trying to work through revisit some basic physics and am working through some electrostatics examples (in Griffith for example). I'm currently working through the 'classic' problem for the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Method_of_image_charges" i.e. a pont charge a small distance (d) from a grounded conducting plane.

I can follow through most of the steps myself but there is one part where you sum the potentials from the real and the image charge that I can't wrap my head around.




Homework Equations



The relevant sum in cylindrical co-ordinates:

\frac{dV}{dz} = k \left( \frac{-q(z-d)}{[r^{2}+(z-d)^{2}]^{3/2}} + \frac{q(z+d)}{[r^{2}+(z+d)^{2}]^{3/2}} \right)

b]3. The Attempt at a Solution [/b]

My math appears to have gotten quite rusty and I'm unsure where to start. I have a feeling there's a simple trick to it but I can't see it with how messy the sum is. Anyone have any ideas?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What exactly is your question?
 
It's embarassing but I'm blanking on how to add those together to simplify the expression. Everything I tried to get a common denominator to add together has failed, though that could be ther confusion of the messy terms.

I was wondering if someone could point me in the right direction if I'm missing something.
 
I'd leave it as is. That's about the cleanest form you're going to get it in. In other words, it's not coming out a mess only because you're not remembering your algebra. :wink:
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top