Confusion about position operator in QM

ShayanJ
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
2,801
Reaction score
606
In quantum mechanics, the position operator(for a single particle moving in one dimension) is defined as Q(\psi)(x)=x\psi(x), with the domain D(Q)=\{\psi \epsilon L^2(\mathbb R) | Q\psi\epsilon L^2 (\mathbb R) \}. But this means no square-integrable function in the domain becomes non-square-integrable after being acted by this operator which, in turn, means there exist no function in the domain for which you can't have a M that satisfies ||Q \psi|| \leq M ||\psi|| and so this operator should be bounded. But people say its not bounded!
I'm really confused. What's the point here?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The point is that there needs to be an ##M## such that this inequality holds for all ##\psi##. However, for the position operator, you can easily check that there cannot be such an ##M##, for example by picking a sequence ##\psi_n## of normed, centered Gaussians with increasing standard deviation ##\sigma_n = n## (since ##\lVert Q\psi_n\rVert = \sigma^2##, so you would need an ##M## such that ##\forall n\in\mathbb N:M \geq n^2##, which doesn't exist).
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top