Solving for Vr and VL in an RLC Circuit

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving for the voltages across a resistor (VR) and an inductor (VL) in an RLC circuit. Participants clarify that impedance applies to AC circuits with sinusoidal current and voltage, and emphasize the importance of understanding voltage definitions for capacitors and inductors. The voltage across the inductor is derived from the time derivative of current, while the voltage across the resistor follows Ohm's Law. The correct approach involves analyzing the current's time dependence and its impact on voltage, leading to a conclusion about the voltage behavior during different time intervals. Ultimately, the participants successfully resolve the problem while highlighting the significance of understanding the underlying principles.
k31453
Messages
58
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi i got this question ?



have to find Vr and VL

so can i use this formula :

VR = IR
VL = I * XL?


confuse ?? need help ??

am i on right track?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Impedance is used for AC circuits, when the current and voltage have sinusoidal time dependence. Here the time dependence of the current is different from a sine function. Go back to the definition of the voltage across a capacitor (in terms of charge) and inductor (in terms of derivative of current).

ehild
 
ehild said:
Impedance is used for AC circuits, when the current and voltage have sinusoidal time dependence. Here the time dependence of the current is different from a sine function. Go back to the definition of the voltage across a capacitor (in terms of charge) and inductor (in terms of derivative of current).

ehild


so answer is 0.002 * (20/1) = 0.04 for Vl

right?
 
k31453 said:
so answer is 0.002 * (20/1) = 0.04 for Vl

right?

? You have to show the time dependence of voltages. The answer is not a number.


ehild
 
ehild said:
? You have to show the time dependence of voltages. The answer is not a number.


ehild


whaaattt?

are you kidding mee !

need help please !
 
I try to help and I am not kidding. Read the problem text, please. ehild
 
ehild said:
I try to help and I am not kidding. Read the problem text, please.


ehild

yeah i know its time dependency .. this is the graph for voltage in inductor vs time in ms

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You sent the plot of voltage across the resistor. The shape is correct, but watch out the magnitude. The current is given in A (ampers) The resistance is 2Ω. What is the maximum voltage across the resistor?
What about the inductor?

ehild
 
ehild said:
You sent the plot of voltage across the resistor. The shape is correct, but watch out the magnitude. The current is given in A (ampers) The resistance is 2Ω. What is the maximum voltage across the resistor?
What about the inductor?

ehild



Got it right?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
No, your diagrams are not correct.

Can you write the general expressions (definitions) relating voltage and current for a resistor and an inductor?
 
  • #11
k31453 said:
Got it right?

No. The maximum voltage for the resistor is about right now, but the shape is not. You remember Ohm's Law: The voltage across the resistor is U=IR, proportional to the current. The shape of the U(t) function follows the shape of I(t).

As for the inductor, remember Faraday's law about induced emf in a coil and inductance. How was it defined?

ehild
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #12
I know deal with resistor but i have no clue about inductor
 
  • #13
The voltage across the inductor is U=L(dI/dt) (it is proportional to the time derivative of the current). Determine the derivatives at the different sections and multiply by L.

ehild
 
  • #14
Along with U=L(dI/dt) , We should point out that the voltage across the capacitor v = (1/C) integral (i(t)) and of course voltage across the resistor is v = IR. The plot of current is simple enough that taking the integral or the derivative is simple.
 
  • #15
k31453 said:
so answer is 0.002 * (20/1) = 0.04 for Vl

right?

I agree with you. If the graph is current against time then this is the voltage across the inductor for the first part of the graph AND the last part of the graph. This voltage will be constant over these time intervals.
For the middle part it will be -0.04V.
For the flat bits of the graph there is no change of current with time...what will the voltage across the inductor be ??
 
Last edited:
  • #16
technician said:
I agree with you. If the graph is current against time then this is the voltage across the inductor for the first part of the graph AND the last part of the graph. This voltage will be constant over these time intervals.
For the middle part it will be -0.04V.
For the flat bits of the graph there is no change of current with time...what will the voltage across the inductor be ??

The current changes 2 A in 1 ms,( Edit:20 A in 1 ms) so the voltage on the inductor is not 0.04 V.

ehild
 
Last edited:
  • #17
It looks to me like 20A in 1ms ...
 
  • #18
technician said:
It looks to me like 20A in 1ms ...

I lost a zero, thanks. I edit the previous post. But still, UL is not right.

ehild
 
  • #19
ehild said:
The current changes 2 A in 1 ms,( Edit:20 A in 1 ms) so the voltage on the inductor is not 0.04 V.

ehild

so it will be this graph right because di/dt is derivitve !

 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #20
k31453 said:
so it will be this graph right because di/dt is derivitve !

Excellent! Good solution, nice picture. (Only the unit V is missing from the vertical axis.)

ehild
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #21
ehild said:
Excellent! Good solution, nice picture. (Only the unit V is missing from the vertical axis.)

ehild

Yeah i solve the question but i forget how i did it and why is like that !?

:(:cry:
 
  • #22
Go to post #13:smile:

ehild
 
  • #23
ehild said:
Go to post #13:smile:

ehild

gotchya for 1 ms liner becomes flat and than flat becomes no gradient follow on right?
 
  • #24
The flat part has zero gradient so zero induced voltages.

ehild
 
  • #25
ehild said:
The flat part has zero gradient so zero induced voltages.

ehild

Nice ! thanks for all the help !
 
  • #26
You are welcome.:smile:

ehild
 

Similar threads

But is it the same for AC circuits?
Replies
9
Views
2K
Cutoff frequency for this RLC circuit
Replies
12
Views
7K
Series RLC and Parallel RLC circuits
Replies
15
Views
5K
Current in RLC Series Circuit: Need Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
Calculating the value of R for a resistor in an RLC series circuit
Replies
4
Views
6K
Resonant frequency of L - R||C circuit
Replies
21
Views
1K
RLC Resonance: Understanding VL and VC Magnitudes
Replies
2
Views
2K
RLC Circuit: Calculate Resonant Frequency, Reactance & Impedence
Replies
1
Views
2K
Archived Series RLC Circuits: Calculate VL, VC, VR & Phase Angle Phi
Replies
1
Views
8K
Calculation of current in driven series RLC circuit
Replies
8
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top