Confusion with formulas for wavefunctions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around confusion regarding the appropriate formulas for wavefunctions in 2D and 3D problems. The original poster is uncertain about transitioning from a formula involving sqrt(8) to a simpler form and whether to use their notes or a different source. Participants clarify that the 2D problem can be approached by separating variables, allowing the wave function to be expressed as a product of functions dependent on x and y. There is emphasis on the need for the original poster to solve the 2D problem independently, despite having found solutions for 1D and 3D cases. Ultimately, the key takeaway is that the wave function for the 2D problem is indeed separable.
Cocoleia
Messages
293
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


I am working on this problem:
upload_2017-4-1_16-21-29.png


The formula I am given in my notes is:
upload_2017-4-1_16-26-42.png

I found a website which explains this problem, and they give this formula:
upload_2017-4-1_16-27-8.png

But then, their answer is:
upload_2017-4-1_16-27-48.png

And I don't see how they went from sqrt(8) to 2 on the numerator. I am confused which formula to use where.
I am confused as to which formula I should use... my notes don't make any difference between L1, L2 and L3, but then it doesn't matter in this case in the end.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have found a solution for the 3D problem. Yours is the 2D problem, which is slightly different.
 
PeroK said:
You have found a solution for the 3D problem. Yours is the 2D problem, which is slightly different.
The solution I found was supposed to be for the exact same problem I am working on. In this case do I use the formula from my notes ? Or there is a completely different one that I am forgetting ?
 
PeroK said:
You have found a solution for the 3D problem. Yours is the 2D problem, which is slightly different.
Could I use this one:
upload_2017-4-1_16-52-6.png

and then add the y-component somehow ?
 
Cocoleia said:
Could I use this one:
and then add the y-component somehow ?

You've found the 1D solution and the 3D solution. I think you are supposed to solve the 2D problem for yourself!
 
Cocoleia said:
Could I use this one:
View attachment 115925
and then add the y-component somehow ?

Yes, your problem in 2- or 3 dimension is separable. That, is the wave function for the 2-dimensional problem can be written as a product of two wave functions, one depending on ##x## and the other on ##y##.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top