Connected Capacitors: Charge & Potential Diffrences

  • Thread starter Thread starter andrewdavis23
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitors
AI Thread Summary
When two capacitors, C1 and C2, are connected, the charge from the initially charged capacitor C1 (Q0) redistributes between the two capacitors. The charge on each capacitor becomes Q1 = Q0/2 and Q2 = Q0/2, leading to equal charge distribution. However, the potential difference across each capacitor is not zero, as this would violate Kirchhoff's loop rule (KVL). Instead, the voltage across each capacitor must satisfy KVL, ensuring the total voltage in the circuit remains consistent. The correct approach confirms that charge distribution must adhere to KVL principles for accurate results.
andrewdavis23
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An isolated capacitor C1 carries a charge Q0. Its wires are then connected to those of a second capacitor C2, previously uncharged. What charge will each carry now? What will be the potential difference across each?

Homework Equations


C=Q/V

The Attempt at a Solution


I figured the charge would eventually become evenly distributed (no measure of time was given). So, I figured...

Q1=Q2=1/2 Q0

The potential difference (voltage) would be zero because the charges are equal. ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure?

Lets see what happens if we take your first answer as correct. You said (from a very obvious perspective) that charge gets equally distributed, but then if you apply Kirchhoff's loop rule (KVL) across the closed circuit, doesn't it get violated?? The total voltage difference across the loop turns out to be:

Q0/2C1-Q0/2C2

which is not equal to zero... which means that you answer isn't correct. Any any case you can't violate KVL!

Indeed you try to distribute the charge in such a way that KVL is satisfied, and since the sum of the charges present in the plates has to be Q0... you will get the correct answer!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top