Conservation of Angular Momentum w/ Spring

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a spring and a block, focusing on the conservation of angular momentum and energy. The user attempts to derive the spring's extension, x, after the block is kicked, leading to equations involving kinetic energy and angular momentum. Confusion arises regarding the correct interpretation of the spring's extension at 90 degrees versus maximum extension, with clarification provided that the extension is measured at 90 degrees. The user ultimately derives a cubic equation, resulting in an extension of approximately 0.839 meters, while questioning the applicability of certain equations related to circular motion. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the system's dynamics rather than applying uniform circular motion equations incorrectly.
kabailey
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Relaxed spring is sitting on a horizontal surface. A block is attached at one of its ends is kicked with a horizontal velocity, v1, given to it. The block will move and stretch. Find the distance, x, the spring will stretch. X is in meters.

l0=1 m
m=1 kg
k=1 N/m
v1=1 m/s

Homework Equations



F=-kx T=2∏√(m/k) w=√(k/m) w=v/l0 kx=mrw2 KE=(1/2)mwI

The Attempt at a Solution


Plugging in the given and solving for the variables I get w=1 rad/s, T=2∏, l0=1 m. The equation that I get to relate the initial and final lengths is mw2(l0+x)=mwl02

I am having hard time understanding this material. I would really appreciate some help. Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • scan0001.jpg
    scan0001.jpg
    33.2 KB · Views: 1,362
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi. Consetvations of angular momentum and energy make sense, do they?
 
yes it makes sense. similar to the idea of conservation of momentum, P=m*v.I also understand kinetic energy initial will equal kinetic energy final.
 
Energy 1/2 mv1^2 = 1/2 mv2^2 + 1/2 k x^2
Angular momentum mv1l0 = mv2(l0+x)
They would make sense to you.
Regards.
 
sweet springs said:
Energy 1/2 mv1^2 = 1/2 mv2^2 + 1/2 k x^2
Angular momentum mv1l0 = mv2(l0+x)

Solving for x in the energy equation, I get x=1/v2

Substituting 1/v2 in the angular momentum equation, I get v2=0. When I go back to solve for x, I get x=0.

Is this correct?
 
Last edited:
Hi.

You should get quadratic equation from these equation. Do good practice in mathematics.

Regards.
 
Query: Do they want the extension when the spring is 90° to its initial position, or when the spring is at maximum extension?

The reason I ask is there's no guarantee that the angle that the velocity V2 will be perpendicular to the spring when the "true anomaly" (the angle between the initial position and the current position) is 90°. In fact if I were to guess, I'd put that occurrence at 180° from the initial position.
 
gneill said:
Query: Do they want the extension when the spring is 90° to its initial position, or when the spring is at maximum extension?

The reason I ask is there's no guarantee that the angle that the velocity V2 will be perpendicular to the spring when the "true anomaly" (the angle between the initial position and the current position) is 90°. In fact if I were to guess, I'd put that occurrence at 180° from the initial position.

Sorry I did not notice your post. The extension is at 90 degrees.
 
Sweet Springs thank you for your help!

The final equation I get is x^3+2(x^2)-2=0, which gives me 0.839m as the final answer
 
  • #10
Question regarding this problem, how come I cannot use ma=m(v^2/r)=kx to solve this equation?
 
  • #11
Yes I also have this question.. Why can't we use ma=(mV^2)/r=kx
 
  • #12
Hi.
kabailey said:
Sweet Springs thank you for your help!
The final equation I get is x^3+2(x^2)-2=0, which gives me 0.839m as the final answer
By deleting v2, I have got the equation
y^4 + 2y^3 + y^2 - 2By - B = 0 where B = mv1^2 / kl0^2 = 1, y=x/lo

kabailey said:
Question regarding this problem, how come I cannot use ma=m(v^2/r)=kx to solve this equation?
Interesting. Show me your result please.
Regards.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
I did not use the m(v^2/r)=kx. I was curious as to why one could not use this relationship. m(v^2/r) is to be used in an uniform circle and this system would not produce an uniform circle, thus one would yield an incorrect result.

Thank you for all of your help sweet springs.
 
Back
Top