Conservation of Energy Help (p2)

AI Thread Summary
To determine the height from which a compact car must be dropped to match its kinetic energy at 105 km/h, the conservation of energy principle is applied. The kinetic energy (K) is calculated using the formula K = 1/2mv^2, and potential energy (U) is expressed as U = mg(delta h). The user attempted to equate gravitational potential energy to kinetic energy, simplifying the equation by canceling mass. However, there was a critical error in converting the speed from kilometers per hour to meters per second, leading to an incorrect height calculation. Accurate unit conversion is essential for solving the problem correctly.
kissafilipino
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



From what height would a compact car have to be dropped to have the same kinetic energy that it has when being driven at 105 km/h? Unless otherwise directed, assume that air resistance is negligible.

Answer: __ m
Velocity: 105 km/h -> 105000 m/s

Height: ?



Homework Equations


Conservation of energy equation: (thanks to user MillerGenuine)
U= potential energy
K= kinetic energy
Conservation of
energy => Kf + Uf = Ki + Ui

K = 1/2mv^2
U = mg(delta h)


The Attempt at a Solution


My attempt was somewhat he same trying to input in the equation, what height = the same kinetic energy of 115 k/m. So I said, gravitational potential energy = kinetic energy
U = K
mg(delta h) = (1/2)mv^2
Since mass is in both sides, it can be taken out.
g(delta h) = (1/2)v^2
(9.81)(delta h) = (1/2)105000^2
(9.81)(delta h) = (1/2)11025000000
(9.81)(delta h) = 5512500000
delta h = 561926605 m?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Keep your units straight. Kilometers/hour is not SI units.
 
Exactly, that I understood, which is why I changed it from Km to meters
105 km/h -> 105000 m/s and used it in the equation: mg(delta h) = (1/2)mv^2
 
You changed km -> m but didn't correctly change hours -> seconds. 105km/h is about the speed a car is driven. Does your speed sound reasonable?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top