Conservation of Energy/Momentum with Rotation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving the conservation of momentum and energy in a system with two rotating balls and a putty wad. The initial momentum is attributed solely to the putty, while the final momentum includes both balls and the putty. The participant explores conservation of energy and angular momentum, concluding that angular momentum is conserved due to the absence of external torques. The final calculation for angular speed yields 0.233 rad/s, which is confirmed as correct. The complexities of momentum and energy conservation in inelastic collisions are also acknowledged.
kelslee28
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two balls of mass 2.26 kg are attached to the ends of a thin rod of negligible mass and length 72 cm. The rod is free to rotate without friction about a horizontal axis through its center. A putty wad of mass 145 g drops onto one of the balls, with a speed 2.7 m/s, and sticks to it. What is the angular speed of the system just after the putty wad hits?

Homework Equations


Conservation of momentum
p = mv
L= Iw
Lparticle = m rperpendicular v

Conservation of Energy
KE= 1/2mv2
Rotational KE = 1/2Iw2
I = 1/2mh2

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried this both with using conservation of momentum, conservation of energy, and torque. Torque seemed like the easiest but I have no way of getting angular velocity from that without a time.
For conservation of momentum I said that the initial momentum consisted of only the momentum of the putty. The final momentum I said was the momentum of ball 1, ball 2 and the putty put together. So I had m2v = m1(1/2L)w + m2(1/2L)v

I solved for w and got w = [m2v - m2(1/2L)v]/m1(1/2L)

For conservation of energy I said that the initial energy was only the kinetic energy of the putty KE = 1/2mv2
The final energy is the total rotational energy of ball 1, ball 2 and the putty.
1/2mv2 = 1/2(m1(1/2L)2) + 1/2((m1+m2)(1/2L)2) w2
I solved for w and got the square root of [m2v2]/ [m1L2/4 + (m1+m2)L2/4]

I am really just at a loss as to what I am doing wrong. None of my methods are working!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, angular momentum is conserved as well, in the absence of any net external torques.

Edit: I don't think that the momentum of either of the individual balls is conserved, because each one has a force acting on it (by virtue of the fact that it is attached to a rigid rod), a centripetal force that acts to keep the balls moving in a circular path. Hence, their momenta are continuously changing due to their velocities continuously changing direction.

Also, I don't think that momentum is conserved in the collision, because presumably some sort of rigid "stand" is being used to fix the whole rotating rod system to a surface (hence, the whole thing will not be pushed downward or tilt when the putty hits it). So, again, an external force of some kind is acting on the system.

I don't think that kinetic energy is necessarily conserved either, because the putty hits one of the balls and sticks to it (a perfectly inelastic collision). All of its kinetic energy is gone, going into deforming the putty, making sound, etc.

Angular momentum is conserved, however, because there are no net external torques on the system. Conservation of angular momentum should be sufficient to solve the problem.
 
Last edited:
So this is what I did.
m1 = mass of ball1 and ball2
m2 = mass of putty

1/2Lm2V = Iw (of the ball on the left) + Iw (the ball on the right plus the mass of the putty)

1/2Lm2V = [m1((1/2)L)2 + (m1+m2)((1/2)L)2]w

solve for w

[1/2Lm2V]/[m1((1/2)L)2 + m1+m2((1/2)L)2]

I got 0.233 rad/s Edit
Is this right?
 
Last edited:
It's right.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top