Conservation of energy of an elevator cable

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving an elevator cab's cable snapping and its subsequent motion. The user successfully calculated the speed of the cab just before hitting the spring but encountered difficulties in determining the maximum compression of the spring and the bounce-back distance. Confusion arose from the large numbers generated in the equations, particularly with the spring constant conversion from MN/m to N/m. Participants advised checking calculations and correcting the spring constant term to resolve the quadratic equation accurately. The conversation emphasizes the importance of careful unit conversion and arithmetic in solving physics problems.
iamkristing
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


he cable of the 1,800 kg elevator cab in Fig. 8-51 snaps when the cab is at rest at the first floor, where the cab bottom is a distance d = 3.7 m above a cushioning spring whose spring constant is k = 0.15 MN/m. A safety device clamps the cab against guide rails so that a constant frictional force of 4.4 kN opposes the cab's motion. (a) Find the speed of the cab just before it hits the spring. (b) Find the maximum distance x that the spring is compressed (the frictional force still acts during this compression). (c) Find the distance (above the point of maximum compression) that the cab will bounce back up the shaft.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I got (a)...b and c are where I hit problems.

for b i used the equation...

mg(h+x) + F(h+x)(cos(pi))=.5kx^2

Now when I tried to solve for x i got an equation with huge numbers:

49012+13247x-0.075x^2
It just doesn't seem reasonable to solve for x here, and I know i must be doing something wrong I just can't see it.

for (c):

I used 1/2k(x)^2 - F(x+h) = (1800)(9.81)(x+h)

I would plug in x from c, its just x that I can't find.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
iamkristing said:
for b i used the equation...

mg(h+x) + F(h+x)(cos(pi))=.5kx^2
Looks good.

Now when I tried to solve for x i got an equation with huge numbers:

49012+13247x-0.075x^2
Check those numbers. (Realize that MN = 1 000 000 N.)
 
im still getting an answer of about 6 million...when the answer is 90...
 
Check again.
iamkristing said:
Now when I tried to solve for x i got an equation with huge numbers:

49012+13247x-0.075x^2
The numbers in your first two terms are reasonable, but that 0.075 is WAY off. (It's a million times too small.)
 
i adjusted that term by a million. and now that term is too large. I plugged in the correct answer of 90, hoping that the entire term will go to zero. But it goes to a number greater than -6 million.

I am supposed to be solving for the x^2 and the x in the equation correct?
 
Not sure where that answer of 90 m comes from. I solved it, getting a much smaller number. (I might certainly have made an arithmetic error.)

Correct that last term and solve the quadratic equation.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top