Conservation of energy of an elevator cable

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves the conservation of energy in the context of an elevator cab that falls and compresses a spring after its cable snaps. The scenario includes parameters such as the mass of the elevator, the height above the spring, the spring constant, and a frictional force opposing the motion.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the equations used to relate gravitational potential energy, spring compression, and frictional forces. There are attempts to solve for the maximum compression of the spring and the subsequent motion of the cab after compression.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided feedback on the calculations, particularly regarding the numerical values used in the equations. There is ongoing exploration of the correct values and the implications of those values on the results, with no clear consensus on the correct approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the conversion of units and the impact of large numbers in their calculations. There is mention of a specific answer that seems inconsistent with the calculations being performed, indicating potential misunderstandings or errors in the setup of the equations.

iamkristing
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


he cable of the 1,800 kg elevator cab in Fig. 8-51 snaps when the cab is at rest at the first floor, where the cab bottom is a distance d = 3.7 m above a cushioning spring whose spring constant is k = 0.15 MN/m. A safety device clamps the cab against guide rails so that a constant frictional force of 4.4 kN opposes the cab's motion. (a) Find the speed of the cab just before it hits the spring. (b) Find the maximum distance x that the spring is compressed (the frictional force still acts during this compression). (c) Find the distance (above the point of maximum compression) that the cab will bounce back up the shaft.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I got (a)...b and c are where I hit problems.

for b i used the equation...

mg(h+x) + F(h+x)(cos(pi))=.5kx^2

Now when I tried to solve for x i got an equation with huge numbers:

49012+13247x-0.075x^2
It just doesn't seem reasonable to solve for x here, and I know i must be doing something wrong I just can't see it.

for (c):

I used 1/2k(x)^2 - F(x+h) = (1800)(9.81)(x+h)

I would plug in x from c, its just x that I can't find.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
iamkristing said:
for b i used the equation...

mg(h+x) + F(h+x)(cos(pi))=.5kx^2
Looks good.

Now when I tried to solve for x i got an equation with huge numbers:

49012+13247x-0.075x^2
Check those numbers. (Realize that MN = 1 000 000 N.)
 
im still getting an answer of about 6 million...when the answer is 90...
 
Check again.
iamkristing said:
Now when I tried to solve for x i got an equation with huge numbers:

49012+13247x-0.075x^2
The numbers in your first two terms are reasonable, but that 0.075 is WAY off. (It's a million times too small.)
 
i adjusted that term by a million. and now that term is too large. I plugged in the correct answer of 90, hoping that the entire term will go to zero. But it goes to a number greater than -6 million.

I am supposed to be solving for the x^2 and the x in the equation correct?
 
Not sure where that answer of 90 m comes from. I solved it, getting a much smaller number. (I might certainly have made an arithmetic error.)

Correct that last term and solve the quadratic equation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
14K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K