Constant pressure heat of reaction -> constant volume q

AI Thread Summary
The constant pressure heat of reaction for the given reaction is qp = −3256 kJ mol−1 at 25 °C. To find the constant volume heat of reaction, qV, the equation ΔU = ΔH - ΔnRT is used, where Δn represents the change in moles of gas. The calculation shows that ΔU = -3135 kJ/mol after substituting the values. The value of -49 for Δn is derived from the difference in moles of gaseous reactants and products, which is crucial for determining the work done. The solution appears to be correct based on the provided calculations.
jybe
Messages
41
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


For the reaction below, the constant pressure heat of reaction is qp = −3256 kJ mol−1 at 25 °C. What is the constant volume heat of reaction, qV , at 25 °C?

16 CO(g) + 33 H2(g) ⟶ C16H34(l) + 16 H2O(l)

Enter your answer in kJ mol−1, rounded to the nearest kilojoule.

Homework Equations


At constant pressure, the heat of reaction is equal to the enthalpy change

At constant volume, the heat of reaction is equal to the internal energy change: ΔH = ΔU + ΔnRT

ΔU = ΔH - ΔnRT

The Attempt at a Solution



ΔU = -3256kJ/mol - ΔnRT
Edit:

ΔU = -3256kJ/mol - (-49)(8.314x10^-3)(298.15)

ΔU = -3135 kJ/mol

Have I done it correctly?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks correct to me.
 
Chestermiller said:
It looks correct to me.
I was wondering about the -49 used for ##\Delta n## -- what is the reasoning ?
 
BvU said:
I was wondering about the -49 used for ##\Delta n## -- what is the reasoning ?
It's the change in moles of gas gathered from the equation, used to calculate work done
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top