Proof of Constant Rule: f'(x)=0

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheKracken
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant Proof
TheKracken
Messages
355
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


For the Constant function f(x)=c prove that f'(x)= 0

Homework Equations


Alright so the relevant equation would be the Difference quotient or definition of a derivative.


The Attempt at a Solution


This is what I said

I restated the equation as this
f(x)=c >>>> f(c)= c(x^0)

Then I imputed into definition of derivative

(c(x+h)^0 - c(x^0))/ h

Then I solved it to be

(c-c)/h = 0/h
and then set h to 0 and then you get 0/0 which is non determinant form. I am not sure if this "proves" the statements to be true or if since it is 0/0 that doesn't show anything.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TheKracken said:

Homework Statement


For the Constant function f(x)=c prove that f'(x)= 0

Homework Equations


Alright so the relevant equation would be the Difference quotient or definition of a derivative.

The Attempt at a Solution


This is what I said

I restated the equation as this
f(x)=c >>>> f(c)= c(x^0)

Then I imputed into definition of derivative

(c(x+h)^0 - c(x^0))/ h

You don't need an artificial ##x^0## factor. It is just ##c-c##.
Then I solved it to be

(c-c)/h = 0/h = 0
and then set h to 0 and then you get 0/0 which is non determinant form. I am not sure if this "proves" the statements to be true or if since it is 0/0 that doesn't show anything.[/QUOTE]

That comes out zero before you let ##h\to 0## so the limit is zero. It is not indeterminante 0/0. So you're done.
 
So by including the artificial x^0 I actually made the proof incorrect? I am curious what is the most proper way to represent this proof? As I am going to be a math major, I don't really know how they would prefer this to be represented.
 
TheKracken said:
So by including the artificial x^0 I actually made the proof incorrect? I am curious what is the most proper way to represent this proof? As I am going to be a math major, I don't really know how they would prefer this to be represented.

I would write it like this. Given ##f(x)=c## then$$
f'(0) = \lim_{h\to 0}\frac {f(0+h)-f(0)}{h} = \lim_{h\to 0}\frac {c-c}{h}=
\lim_{h\to 0}\frac {0}{h}=\lim_{h\to 0} 0=0$$to be explicit and correct.
 
did you mean f'(c) ?
 
Woops, I was thinking you wanted f'(0). Just put ##x## instead of ##0## in that difference quotient in the first two expressions. It's the same arithmetic.
 
Also you need to understand or be able to see that the limit is 0. I mean this expression: ##lim_{h \to 0} {0 \over h}## is 0 for every h, it is a horizontal line heading toward the origin, so of course the limit is 0.
 
Back
Top