Constitutive Law (stress-strain relationship) of maxwell material

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on defining the stress-strain relationship for a viscoelastic Maxwell material, highlighting a discrepancy in the constitutive law between two sources. The user presents a 1D relationship and questions the division by 2 in the 2D case from a referenced paper. It is clarified that shear strain can be defined in multiple ways, suggesting that the tensorial shear strain may resolve the confusion regarding the factor of 2. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding dimensionality in constitutive laws. Overall, the discussion aims to clarify the mathematical representation of viscoelastic behavior in different dimensions.
melda
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am trying to define the stress strain relationship for a viscoelastic material. For a Maxwell model, I have the relationship in 1D as dE/dt = T / viscosity + (dT/dt)/ elastic_modulus. Where E is the strain and T is stress - t is time.

But in a reference, (Neutrophil transit times through pulmonary capillaries: the effects of capillary geometry and fMLP-stimulation - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1302283) I have the constitutive law as dE/dt = T / (2*cell_viscosity) + (dT/dt)/ (2*cell_shear_modulus).

The shear modulus selection is fine, as the stress tensor and strain tensor are for pure shear (only the deviatoric response is considered). The case in the paper is for 2D. I do not understand where divide by 2 is coming from. Would this be related to dimentions of the system? I thoght only using the tensors for 2D/3D would be sufficient and the formula would be generic...

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Inducing EMF Through a Coil: Understanding Flux'
Thank you for reading my post. I can understand why a change in magnetic flux through a conducting surface would induce an emf, but how does this work when inducing an emf through a coil? How does the flux through the empty space between the wires have an effect on the electrons in the wire itself? In the image below is a coil with a magnetic field going through the space between the wires but not necessarily through the wires themselves. Thank you.
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...

Similar threads

Back
Top