Constructing a Wall Imaging Device

AI Thread Summary
Constructing a wall imaging device involves using a speaker to generate sound frequencies on one side of a wall and a receiver on the other to visualize internal structures like cabling and studs. While similar technologies exist for ground penetration radar, they do not provide images of walls. A suggested approach is to use an exciter source and a device akin to a metal detector to probe the wall area. This concept resembles a medical sonograph, focusing on sound transmission rather than reflection. The feasibility of such a device remains uncertain, but it presents an interesting avenue for exploration.
nanoWatt
Messages
85
Reaction score
2
I was wondering if it was possible to construct a certain device. There would be a speaker on one side of a wall generating a certain frequency, and on the other side a receiver that would give an image of what was in the wall, such as cabling, studs, etc. I'm sure the technology exists, but I would like to build something relatively inexpensive. I don't need a whole lot of resolution. Just enough to tell what's there.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
They have such devices. It looks into the ground using radar. I saw it on CSI, it's got to be true.
 
Actually, it won't be in the ground, as I have access to both sides of the wall. Just something to measure the sound intensity as it comes through in different points, and give that an image of sorts. I know it exists, but I'm not sure what it's called, or how to build it.

DaveC426913 said:
They have such devices. It looks into the ground using radar. I saw it on CSI, it's got to be true.
 
There is something they use with locating underground utilities that uses the same basic application. However, it doesn't provide a picture of the wall. Essentially you place an exciter source at a distance away from you. You then use a device that is very similar to a metal detector and probe the area. I can't say if it would work with walls, but it may be something to look at.
 
It seems to me that this is a variation of a medical sonograph; it just relies upon transmission, rather than reflection, of the beam.
 
I have Mass A being pulled vertically. I have Mass B on an incline that is pulling Mass A. There is a 2:1 pulley between them. The math I'm using is: FA = MA / 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If MB is greater then FA, it pulls FA up as MB moves down the incline. BUT... If I reverse the 2:1 pulley. Then the math changes to... FA = MA * 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If FA is greater then MB, it pulls MB up the incline as FA moves down. It's confusing...
Back
Top