Constructive Interference of Sound waves

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating points of constructive interference between two speakers producing a 2000Hz sound frequency. The wavelength is determined to be approximately 0.1715m, and the formula for constructive interference is established as r2 - r1 = nλ. Participants clarify that the goal is to express the positions of constructive interference in terms of x, specifically between 0 and 1.5m. The midpoint at x = 0.75m is identified as a key point, with additional points derived by adjusting the integer n to find other positions of interference. The conversation emphasizes the importance of considering both positive and negative values of n to find all relevant positions between the speakers.
amit25
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




A pair of speakers connected to the same signal generator face each other, one at x=0 and the other at x=1.5m. If they are producing a sound frequency of 2000Hz what are the points (position x) of constructive interference between the speakers? Express your answer in terms of λ

Homework Equations



r2-r1=nλ

The Attempt at a Solution



I calculated the wavelength from v=fλ
λ=343m/s / 2000Hz
λ=0.1715m

then from r=L-nλ/2

n=0 r=1.5/2=0.75m

n=1 r=1.5-.1715/2=0.66m

n=2 r=1.5-2(0.1715)/2= 0.58m
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not sure if you had a question here. The problem says to find values of x for constructive interference. So, I think it would be best to state your answer as values of "x" rather than "r". (You didn't actually state what "r" represents.)

The question also says to express your answers in terms of λ. [I think you did this, except it would be best to write it as x = (L-nλ)/2]

Did you find all the answers? Do you think negative values of n would yield possible answers?
 
Last edited:
i think r is suppose to represent distance. The question gives me the formula in terms of r
I guess my question is if my calculations are correct? Not sure if I am on the right track. I am not sure how many answers to give I wasnt told but I calculated up to 3.
 
amit25 said:
i think r is suppose to represent distance.

What distance? Can you describe what r represents?

The question gives me the formula in terms of r.

I didn't see any formula given in the question.

I guess my question is if my calculations are correct? Not sure if I am on the right track. I am not sure how many answers to give I wasnt told but I calculated up to 3.

Well, I think you are to find all the values of x between the speakers that correspond to constructive interference. Since one speaker is at x = 0 and the other is at x = L, you need to find all constructive interference locations x that lie between 0 and 1.5 m.

It seems to me that your equation x = (L-nλ)/2 is essentially correct . You can write this as x = L/2 - nλ/2. For n = 0, you get x = L/2. Thus, the midpoint between the speakers is a point of constructive interference. This makes sense because the sound travels the same distance from both speakers to get to this point. (The "path difference" = 0).

You can keep plugging in other integer values of n to get more values of x. As you can see, increasing n by 1 moves the point of interference a half wavelength toward the left speaker. If n gets too large, x becomes negative and therefore does not correspond to a point located between the speakers.

You should also be able to see that you can plug in negative values for n. Or, equivalently, you could write x = L/2 +nλ/2 for positive values of n. Now each successive value of n moves you a half wavelength toward the speaker on the right. When n gets too large, x will be larger than 1.5 m and therefore does not represent a point between the speakers.

[The general idea is that if you are located at a point of constructive interference, then you can get another point of constructive interference by moving a half wavelength to the right (or to the left). That's because you will move a half wavelength closer to one speaker while at the same time moving a half wavelength farther from the other speaker. So, you will have changed the "path difference" of the sound by one full wavelength.]
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top