Continous charge or mass distributions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of electric fields and centers of mass for continuous charge and mass distributions in electrodynamics. Participants emphasize that while physical entities are discrete, integrals are used to approximate these distributions due to practical limitations in accounting for every individual charge or mass. The conversation highlights the necessity of continuous models in physics, particularly in fluid dynamics, where tracking every atom is impractical. Ultimately, the use of integrals is justified when the scale of observation renders the discrete nature of particles negligible.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic electrodynamics principles
  • Familiarity with integral calculus and its applications
  • Knowledge of fluid dynamics concepts
  • Awareness of the limitations of classical electrodynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the application of integral calculus in calculating electric fields
  • Study the implications of continuous versus discrete models in physics
  • Investigate the role of uncertainty in particle position in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the breakdown of classical electrodynamics at atomic scales
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and students studying electrodynamics or fluid dynamics who seek to understand the implications of continuous models in practical calculations.

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
Often you want to calculate the electric field of a lot of charges or the center of mass for a lot of small masses.

When we have a rigid body or something similar in the world of electrodynamics, my book tells me always to calculate the cm or total field as an integral, because "the distributions are continous". Now I have always speculated about this line "they are continous". Because in this world everything is discrete. So isn't it just an approximation when you replace the sum of a hell of a lot of elements with an integral?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
aaaa202 said:
Often you want to calculate the electric field of a lot of charges or the center of mass for a lot of small masses.

When we have a rigid body or something similar in the world of electrodynamics, my book tells me always to calculate the cm or total field as an integral, because "the distributions are continous". Now I have always speculated about this line "they are continous". Because in this world everything is discrete. So isn't it just an approximation when you replace the sum of a hell of a lot of elements with an integral?

What if it is an approximation? Physics is about tractable models of the world. Often such models are based upon continuous manifolds, continuous and differentiable functions, conservation principles, and other such niceties where warranted. Intractable models have limited appeal.

Every particle has an uncertainty of position which is further blurred over even brief time periods. How would you set up a calculation in, say, fluid dynamics, if each time you had to account for every atom's location? Could you ever complete the calculation in time to be relevant?

Feel free employ the machinery of sigma notation rather than integral calculus whenever you can pinpoint the location of every discrete entity for your calculations :smile:

Which decimal place are you worried about and why? :devil:
 
It's a matter of scale as always. If I spin a bike tire there's only certain discrete values of angular momentum it can have (scaled by h), but on the scale I'm looking at I can't even hope to detect the discrete values so it's not really even an approximation to say that it's continuous.

If charges are only spaced out at atomic levels then you're even approaching the limit of self energy, and the point where classical electrodynamics breaks. So, looking at the charge distribution from further out, where electrodynamics is more valid, you can call the distribution continuous. Of course, if you charge up some pith balls and place them in a volume, maybe you shouldn't be calling them continuous.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
13K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K