Continuing to study physics or move to nuclear engineering?

AI Thread Summary
A physics student in Italy is considering transitioning to nuclear engineering after completing a three-year degree, attracted by the potential for better job prospects and financial stability. The discussion highlights the limited opportunities for nuclear power in Italy due to political opposition, prompting the student to explore options abroad. It is advised to research countries that are expanding their nuclear power infrastructure and assess job opportunities for physics graduates in those regions. The importance of financial considerations in career choices is emphasized, suggesting that while passion is important, economic viability cannot be overlooked. Ultimately, the decision should balance personal interests with practical job market realities.
RaamGeneral
Messages
49
Reaction score
1
Hi. I'm a physics student in Italy.

Within a year I hope to have gotten my three years degree. Usually, after that, physics students continue studying in their field choosing among theoretical, astrophysics, particle, nuclear, etc...

Starting from next year we have the opportunity to move to nuclear engineering without any debts. I'm very interested in this possibility.

What do you think? Talking about job and money, do I guess correctly that it's a more appealing field?

Unfortunately, very smart people here in italy killed any opportunity to use nuclear power as energy source. Some work may still remain but I'm very open to move away.

Thank you.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Look at the countries you might consider moving to, and find out which are using, and continuing to build, nuclear power stations. Then, for those same countries, try to assess the job opportunities you might find with a physics degree. Money is certainly not everything, but a gross lack of it can be a serious problem.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top